Abstract 2852
Background
Although definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard of care for most of stage III NSCLC patients, neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery can be considered for some potentially resectable patients. Rationales for neoadjuvant treatment are tumor regression effect before surgery, early eradication of micrometastasis and better tolerability of chemotherapy than in the post-surgical setting. Regarding potential benefits of combining PD-1 blockade with CRT, here we have an ongoing phase Ib trial which assesses the safety and feasibility of the combination of neoadjuvant CRT with durvalumab in potentially resectable stage III NSCLC (NCT03694236).
Trial design
Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC (potentially resectable clinical stage III according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system) are enrolled. Patients receive CRT (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2 with radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions) and durvalumab (Day 1 and 29, 1500mg) during 5 weeks followed by surgery. After surgery, patients are treated with durvalumab for one year (every 4weeks, 1500 mg). The primary endpoints are safety and tolerability. The secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), clinical or pathological downstaging rate and, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the primary tumor. Immune marker analysis by FACS, exome sequencing and RNA sequencing using cancer tissue of pre-treatment, after surgery, and after recurrence will be performed.Table:
1477TiP
Steps of trial | No. of patients | Considerations | |
---|---|---|---|
Neoadjuvant (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2, radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions, durvalumab day 1 and 29, 1500mg) | Stage 11 | 9 | 1) If patients of ≥ 5 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial holds 2) If patients of ≤ 4 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial proceeds to the 2nd stage. |
Stage 2 | 21 | If patients of ≤ 13(43%) has grade≥3 TRAE during the neoadjuvant treatment it will be considered tolerable and further analysis will be performed.2 | |
Surgery | The time and modality of surgery will depend on the surgeon’s discretion. The maximum allowed interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery is 9 weeks. If disease progresses during or after the neoadjuvant therapy, or if the surgeon thinks that the surgery is not feasible, concurrent chemoradiation or chemotherapy alone can be continued. | ||
Adjuvant (durvalumab 1500mg for one year every 4 weeks, total of 13 times.) | The maximum allowed interval between the surgery and adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks. | ||
Follow up | Response evaluation will be done until 5 years after the surgery.3 (Chest CT every 3 months, Abdominal pelvic CT at 1, 2, 5 years after the surgery) |
Additional enrollment will be hold until the first 9 patients proceeds surgery.
2Grade≥3 TRAE during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is expected to be 30∼50% according to the previous data.
3Assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST), version 1.1. TRAE; treatment-related adverse event, CT; Computed tomography.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03694236.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4852 - Impact of routine screening and preemptive treatment on hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Celine Marty
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5225 - The uptake, patient satisfaction and efficacy of scalp cooling among patients receiving chemotherapy in an Irish oncology day ward.
Presenter: William Maher
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1901 - Placebo adverse events (AEs) in targeted and immune cancer therapy in the adjuvant and advanced setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Diego Enrico
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3258 - Reduced antibody levels and high seronegativity rates against vaccine preventable diseases pose a risk factor for infections in patients with solid and hematologic cancers
Presenter: Angela Guzek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3211 - Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome After Therapy With Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Presenter: Veselina Goranova - Marinova
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4949 - Phase I Study of CC-90010 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL)
Presenter: Victor Moreno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2271 - Pretreatment coagulation factors related to prognosis in patients with natural killer/T cell lymphoma
Presenter: Yue Chai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4335 - Diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the elderly. A retrospective analysis of standard versus alternative treatments
Presenter: Irene Sillero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5117 - MIPI as a superior prognostic tool in Mantle Cell Lymphoma compared to monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios
Presenter: Filipa Macedo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5135 - Dose adjustment of chemotherapy in aggressive lymphoma using automated and standardized analysis and evaluation of DNA double strand breaks
Presenter: Julia Schröder
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract