Abstract 2852
Background
Although definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard of care for most of stage III NSCLC patients, neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery can be considered for some potentially resectable patients. Rationales for neoadjuvant treatment are tumor regression effect before surgery, early eradication of micrometastasis and better tolerability of chemotherapy than in the post-surgical setting. Regarding potential benefits of combining PD-1 blockade with CRT, here we have an ongoing phase Ib trial which assesses the safety and feasibility of the combination of neoadjuvant CRT with durvalumab in potentially resectable stage III NSCLC (NCT03694236).
Trial design
Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC (potentially resectable clinical stage III according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system) are enrolled. Patients receive CRT (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2 with radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 25 fractions) and durvalumab (Day 1 and 29, 1500mg) during 5 weeks followed by surgery. After surgery, patients are treated with durvalumab for one year (every 4weeks, 1500 mg). The primary endpoints are safety and tolerability. The secondary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR), R0 resection rate, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), clinical or pathological downstaging rate and, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the primary tumor. Immune marker analysis by FACS, exome sequencing and RNA sequencing using cancer tissue of pre-treatment, after surgery, and after recurrence will be performed.Table:
1477TiP
Steps of trial | No. of patients | Considerations | |
---|---|---|---|
Neoadjuvant (weekly paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 2, radiotherapy 45 Gy in 25 fractions, durvalumab day 1 and 29, 1500mg) | Stage 11 | 9 | 1) If patients of ≥ 5 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial holds 2) If patients of ≤ 4 has grade≥3 TRAE the trial proceeds to the 2nd stage. |
Stage 2 | 21 | If patients of ≤ 13(43%) has grade≥3 TRAE during the neoadjuvant treatment it will be considered tolerable and further analysis will be performed.2 | |
Surgery | The time and modality of surgery will depend on the surgeon’s discretion. The maximum allowed interval between the end of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery is 9 weeks. If disease progresses during or after the neoadjuvant therapy, or if the surgeon thinks that the surgery is not feasible, concurrent chemoradiation or chemotherapy alone can be continued. | ||
Adjuvant (durvalumab 1500mg for one year every 4 weeks, total of 13 times.) | The maximum allowed interval between the surgery and adjuvant therapy is 12 weeks. | ||
Follow up | Response evaluation will be done until 5 years after the surgery.3 (Chest CT every 3 months, Abdominal pelvic CT at 1, 2, 5 years after the surgery) |
Additional enrollment will be hold until the first 9 patients proceeds surgery.
2Grade≥3 TRAE during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is expected to be 30∼50% according to the previous data.
3Assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST), version 1.1. TRAE; treatment-related adverse event, CT; Computed tomography.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03694236.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3309 - Heat Shock Protein 90 chaperones and Protein Kinase D3 regulates androgen-independent prostate cancer development
Presenter: Attila Varga
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3441 - The SWI/SNF driven reprograming for the AR cistrome is NSD2 dependent
Presenter: Katia Ruggero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1659 - IGF1R inhibition affects the survival of HT29 cancer cells by alterations of the TLR9- and autophagy signaling
Presenter: Györgyi Műzes
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1379 - Characterization of atypical dMMR (deficient MisMatch Repair) tumors: a study from a large cohort of 4948 cases
Presenter: Marion Jaffrelot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1657 - Modulation of TLR9-dependent autophagy response via inhibition of c-Met signaling influences the survival of HT29 cancer cells
Presenter: Ferenc Sipos
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3045 - Positive Feedback Activation of Notch Signal by Obesity Enhances Colorectal Tumorigenicity
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2285 - The Pathological and Functional Roles of BRPF1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Lai Hung Carol Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3210 - Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 3 (PTPN3) could be a new therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Akio Yamasaki
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3920 - A Novel bispecific BCMAxCD3 T cell engaging antibody that treat multiple myeloma (MM) with minimal cytokine serection
Presenter: Zhenyu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2691 - Quantitative spatial profiling of lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3)/major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) interaction in gastric and urothelial tumors
Presenter: Cyrus Hedvat
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract