Abstract 2533
Background
ICIs are pivotal therapies in the treatment of pts with R/M HNSCC. The dismal OS of some pts underscores the need to detect pre-treatment prognostic scores.
Methods
Pts with R/M HNSCC receiving pembrolizumab (P) or nivolumab (N) were included in this retrospective analysis. We analyzed the impact of the following pre-treatment variables for OS using a Cox proportional hazards regression model: drug type, age, sex, tumor site, line of therapy, p-16, albumin (alb), hemoglobin (Hb), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), lymphocyte count (LC), platelets (PLT), and neutrophil counts (NC).
Results
66 pts (55%) treated with N and 55 (45%) with P were included. Characteristics: Sex: Male 100 pts (83%), female 21 pts (17%); Mean Age: 62 (SD 11); Performance Status 0-1: 63 pts (52%), 2-3: 58 pts (48%); Line of therapy, 1: 43 pts (36%), 2: 58 pts (48%), 3-4: 20 pts (16%); P-16: positive 44 pts (36%), negative 77 pts (64%); Tumor site: oropharynx 54 pts (45%), oral cavity 23 pts (19%), larynx 16 pts (13%), other 28 pts (23%); Response: complete 11 pts (9%), partial 3 pts (2%), stable disease 47 pts (39%); and disease progression: 60 pts (50%). The OS at 1 and 2 years were 52% (95% confidence interval (CI), 43%-62%) and 27% (CI 17%-42%), respectively. Age, sex, PLT, NC, LC, p-16, alb, Hb, and LDH were included in the multivariable Cox model. Adjusted hazard ratio estimates are: P-16: 0.53 (CI 0.3-0.95, P = 0.03); LC: 0.67 (CI 0.46-0.97, P = 0.03); NC: 1.25 (CI 1.01-1.56, P = 0.04); LDH: 1.67 (CI 1.01-2.78, P = 0.04); Hb: 1.69 (CI 1.00-2.87, P = 0.05); alb: 1.69 (CI 0.94-3.02, P = 0.08); PLT: 1.06 (CI 0.82, 1.37, P = 0.7); Age: 1.02 (CI 0.78-1.34, P = 0.9); and Sex: 0.98 (CI 0.5-1.91, P = 0.9). This model was used to create a nomogram based prognostic score for 1 and 2 year OS probability and median OS time. Internal model validation using bootstrapped based bias corrected estimates showed Nagelkerke’s R2 = 0.18, calibration slope of 0.67, and C-index of 0.7.
Conclusions
Pre-treatment LC, NC as well as LDH, Hb, alb, and p-16 had the largest impact on OS based on a prognostic nomogram. The nomogram may help treatment decisions regarding ICI use in this population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3140 - Phase 2 study of olaparib in previously treated advanced solid tumors with homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) or homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD): LYNK-002
Presenter: David Hyman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2655 - The K-BASKET trial: A prospective phase II biomarker-driven multiple basket trial in Korean solid cancer patients.
Presenter: Seul Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5938 - Cambridge Liquid biopsy “CALIBRATION” study: Can changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) predict durable tumour responses in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer receiving MEDI4736?
Presenter: Constanza Linossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3799 - Validation of a tumour mutational burden workflow on routine histological samples of colorectal cancer and assessment of a cohort with synchronous hepatic metastases
Presenter: Andrea Mafficini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4647 - Microsatellite Instability Testing and Lynch Syndrome Screening For Colorectal Cancer Patients Through Tumor Sequencing
Presenter: Li Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3231 - "Liquid Withdarw" technique in CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy: decreased incidence of complications and increased tissue amount for lung cancer molecular testing.
Presenter: Xue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3282 - WGS Implementation in standard cancer Diagnostics for Every cancer patient (WIDE)
Presenter: Paul Roepman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5905 - Known and unknown gene fusion detection capabilities of solid tumor laboratories conducting next generation sequencing in 6 countries
Presenter: Steph Finucane
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4238 - Clinical and Analytical Accuracy of a 523 Gene Panel Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Solid Tumor Samples
Presenter: Ina Deras
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2493 - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme.
Presenter: Celine De Rop
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract