Abstract 4550
Background
Patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (BM) have a historically poor prognosis, with a reported median overall survival (mOS) of 4-6 months. Aim of this study is to evaluate predictive factors of survival in pts with melanoma BM. Secondly, a multivariate model was used to define groups with distinct prognosis.
Methods
Consecutive pts with melanoma BM treated in two Italian cancer centers were included in this 10-year retrospective cohort study (2008-2018). Baseline clinicopathological factors, systemic and loco-regional treatments were registered. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox model were used to analyze the association of prognostic factors and OS.
Results
150 pts with melanoma BM were enrolled in this study: 42% with a single BM, 51.3% with ≥ 3 extracranial metastatic sites and 38% with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0. About 50.7% of pts had a BRAF mutation. Notably, 56% of pts were asymptomatic at BM diagnosis, and 40% presented high LDH levels at baseline. Overall, mOS after BM diagnosis was 5.78 months (95% CI 4.80-6.67), and median intracranial progression-free survival was 4.63 months (95% CI 3.81-5.12). According to treatment modality, stereotactic radiosurgery/neurosurgery plus systemic therapy showed the best outcome (mOS 12.32 months, 95% CI 7.92-25.30). A multivariate model was used to identify baseline prognostic factors independently associated with OS (Table). Conversely, sex and symptomatic BM did not significantly impact on OS. Predicted survival functions defined 3 distinct prognostic groups (P < 0.0001): favorable (≤ 2 points: mOS 8.47 months, 95% CI 7.52-12.71), intermediate (3 points: mOS 4.93 months, 95% CI 3.84-6.01), poor (≥ 4points: mOS 2.66 months, 95% CI 2.23-3.61).Table:
1363P
Covariates | HR | 95% CI | P | Points |
---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF wild type | 1.95 | 1.22-3.12 | < 0.01 | 1 |
BM > 1 | 2.20 | 1.35-3.59 | < 0.01 | 1 |
LDH ≥ 2 x upper normal limit | 1.83 | 1.07-3.11 | 0.026 | 1 |
ECOG PS > 0 | 2.68 | 1.62-4.43 | 0.0001 | 1 |
Extracranial metastatic sites ≥ 3 | 1.91 | 1.17-3.1 | < 0.01 | 1 |
Age ≥ 65 | 1.86 | 1.15-3.02 | 0.012 | 1 |
Conclusions
This score can be useful for stratifying prognosis in pts with melanoma BM. Prospective studies are needed to validate this score and to explore how it may guide treatment strategy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F. Puglisi: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Research grant / Funding (self): Astrazeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2421 - Lenvatinib plus PD-1 blockade in advanced bile tract carcinoma.
Presenter: Jianzhen Lin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5368 - Durvalumab and Paclitaxel Combination for treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer is safe with very promising efficacy
Presenter: Hazem Ghebeh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1520 - A prospective cohort study on the pharmacokinetics of nivolumab in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer patients
Presenter: Daan Hurkmans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1603 - Safety and clinical activity of subcutaneously (SC) administered anti-PD-1 antibody PF-06801591 in phase I dose-expansion cohorts of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Byoung Cho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3922 - Development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM): A scale to measure quality of life in cancer patients treated with ICMs
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2408 - Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as “chemotherapy (Ctx) sensitization” strategy in advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3612 - Validation of progression-free survival (PFS) as surrogate endpoint in randomised trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Peey Sei Kok
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3827 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of weight-based and fixed dose cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies
Presenter: Michael Migden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2120 - A burst of highly differentiated CD4 TL identifies a subset of fast progressors, and correlates with hyperprogressive disease in NSCLC patients treated with ICI
Presenter: Hugo Arasanz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4254 - Nivolumab treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a French nationwide retrospective cohort (UNIVOC Study)
Presenter: Christos Chouaid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract