Abstract 2676
Background
Oncology nurses are responsible to provide their patients with the evidence-based care. Clinical guidelines or recommendations can be developed by scientific associations as a guide for performing evidence-based practice. These guidelines are often taken into consideration for the assessment of professional responsibility, as well as to guide the practice. The Italian Institute of Health identified the Italian Association of Cancer Nurses (AIIAO) among the scientific societies authorised to produce, adapt and implement guidelines. However, it is important to identify which areas of oncology nursing warrant an action to facilitate AIIAO in setting the agenda. A specific prerequisite for developing high-quality guidelines is incorporating nurses’ views into priority-setting. The aim of this study is to use a bottom-up approach to empirically investigate which areas of oncology nursing require higher priority in the definition of evidence-based recommendations.
Methods
This is a multi-phase study including a cross-sectional national survey. In order to develop the tool for the survey, a systematic search of the literature, a focus group, and content and face validity evaluation will be conducted.
Results
Seven areas were identified by the literature review to develop the survey: (a) fatigue; (b) pain; (c) sleep disorders; (d) secondary symptoms; (e) cognitive impairment resulting from cancer and its treatment; (f) chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; and (g) psychological distress. This research is still ongoing. A panel of researchers are operationalising the identified areas in the items for the national survey. Cancer nurses will be asked to rate the priority of each area for the implementation, adaptation and development of AIIAO clinical guidelines.
Conclusions
The results of this survey might raise awareness about oncology nurses’ opinions on which areas of clinical practice warrant an action. This will facilitate the associations and affiliated working groups in developing evidence-based recommendations. Moreover, a bottom-up mapping of the nurses’ priorities will inform the planning of AIIAO strategic activities targeted to strengthen cancer care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Italian Association of Cancer Nurses (AIIAO).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2494 - CAR-T Nursing Education at a UK Specialist Cancer Hospital
Presenter: Rose Ellard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2438 - Professional Quality of Life, Perceived Stress and Psychological Resistance Levels of Oncology-Hematology Nurses and the Factors Affecting
Presenter: Tugba Pehlivan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3541 - Representation of cancer survivors’ preferences in policies for supportive care: Implications for oncology nursing
Presenter: Samantha Mayo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5093 - Vaginal moisturizing post PDR-Pulse Dose Rate Brachytherapy.
Presenter: Pilar Fernández
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1066 - The stomized, chemo and radiotreated patient vs untreated patient: complications and comparison with data literature
Presenter: Cristoforo Ferrero
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1724 - Evaluating the role of clinical nurse specialist
Presenter: Anita Zeneli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3753 - Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) in a Functional Unit for Lung cancer at the Catalan Institute of Oncology
Presenter: Isabel Brao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
575 - Investigating quality of care for people with cancer and dementia
Presenter: Naomi Farrington
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5578 - Two years of BRCA1 and BRCA2 somatic External Quality Assessment with Gen&tiss Tiss scheme in France
Presenter: Kelly Dufraing
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4868 - Evaluation of markers associated with efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients (pts) with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) from the LATITUDE study
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract