Abstract 1647
Background
The management strategies regarding the strength of reactive topical corticosteroids have not been well evaluated in clinical trials. This FAEISS study is designed to confirm the superior efficacy of reactive topical corticosteroid strategies with serially ranking-DOWN from very strong levels compared with those with serially ranking-UP from weak levels for facial acneiform rash induced by EGFRI.
Methods
Pts with RAS wt mCRC were enrolled in the first registration. All pts received pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline 100 or 200 mg/day and heparinoid moisturizer from the initiation of EGFRIs. Enrolled pts who developed facial acneiform rash within 8 weeks were randomized either to ranking-UP group (UP group) or ranking-DOWN group (DOWN group) (second registration) using minimization method for balancing institution, type of EGFRIs, and sex. Primary endpoint was incidence of Grade2 (moderate) or higher facial acneiform rash during 8 weeks after randomization.
Results
172 RAS wt mCRC pts, of whom 22 pts and 84 pts received cetuximab and panitumumab, respectively, were enrolled and 106 pts were randomized. There was no significant difference in the incidence of Grade 2 ≧ facial acneiform rash between UP group (18 times) and DOWN group (20 times) (stratified Wilcoxon’s rank sum test, one-sided: p = 0.86221). As for secondary end points, proportion of Grade3 or higher facial acneiform rash was 13.2% for UP group and 11.3% for DOWN group, showing no significant difference between the groups (Fisher’s exact test: p = 1.0000). There was no problem of safety concern in both groups.
Conclusions
Topical corticosteroids ranking UP from weak levels was confirmed to be standard therapy for the management of facial acneiform rash in pts with RAS wt mCRC. It would follow that minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer have a prophylactic efficacy while topical corticosteroids have a therapeutic efficacy for facial acneiform rash.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000024113.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
FAEISS Study Group.
Funding
AMED.
Disclosure
N. Yamazaki: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Takarabio; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. K. Kikuchi: Research grant / Funding (institution): POLA; Research grant / Funding (institution): Maruho. H. Fukuda: Honoraria (self): Taiho/chugai; Research grant / Funding (self): National Cancer Center. T. Hamaguchi: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Bayer. N. Boku: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. T. Takenouchi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ono; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis . T. Nishina: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono. S. Yoshikawa: Honoraria (self): Ono; Honoraria (self): Novertis; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. K. Yamazaki: Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo. M. Takahashi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Ono; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Daiichi Sankyo. T. Masuishi: Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha. Y. Kiyohara: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ono; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2413 - Implementation of PRO-CTCAE in phase I clinical trials identifies under reporting of adverse events
Presenter: Zachary Veitch
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
5816 - The ImmunoTOX multidisciplinary board, a descriptive study of collaborative management of immune-related adverse events.
Presenter: Jean-Marie Michot
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
3064 - Development of GOLD (Geriatric Oncology Liaison Development) service to improve outcomes in older people with cancer
Presenter: Matthaios Kapiris
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
3627 - Complementary Medicine (CM) Use in Phase III Clinical Trials (P3T) Conducted by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG)
Presenter: John Wells
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
6024 - Emergency admissions and bad news disclosure as precipitators of suicide: a territory-wide cohort analysis of 458 oncology patients who completed suicides
Presenter: Tai Chung Lam
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
5591 - Worse Patient- Physician Relationship Is Associated With More Fear Of Cancer Recurrence (Deimos Study): A Study Of The Palliative Care Working Committee Of The Turkish Oncology Group (TOG)
Presenter: Ali Alkan
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
7257 - Can tocotrienol reduce time to the first serious adverse event during treatment with FOLFOXIRI for colorectal cancer?
Presenter: Louise Raunkilde
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care - Invited Discussant 1755PD, 1756PD and 1757PD
Presenter: Paolo Bossi
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care - Invited Discussant LBA37, LBA90 and 1758PD
Presenter: Anton Snegovoy
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care - Invited Discussant 1597PD and 1617PD
Presenter: Stein Kaasa
Session: Poster Discussion – Supportive and palliative care
Resources:
Slides
Webcast