Abstract 7194
Background
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) harbors a high tumor mutation burden (TMB) due to ultraviolet light-mediated DNA damage, and are highly immune-responsive. Cemiplimab, a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed death 1 (PD-1), is approved by the FDA and EMA as treatment for advanced CSCC patients who are not candidates for curative surgery. Here we explore the efficacy of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in CSCC- head and neck (HN) patients for whom surgery and radiation was planned.
Methods
Patients with stage III/IV (M0) (AJCC 8th Ed) CSCC-HN were treated with 2 doses of cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic response rate, safety and tolerability, and analysis of candidate biomarkers from pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor specimens.
Results
Twenty patients (18M, 2F) enrolled with median age 69 years (range: 42-88) and stage III (n = 8) or IV (n = 12) disease. Seven (35%) patients experienced grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs); 6 (30%) grade 1 rash/pruritis, 1 (5%) grade 2 myalgia, and 1 (5%) grade 2 fatigue. There were no grade ≥ 3 AEs and no surgical delays. ORR by RECIST was 30% (6 partial response, 12 stable disease, 2 progressive disease). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 11 (55%) patients and major pathology response (MPR, ≤ 10% viable tumor) in an additional 3 (15%) patients. TMB and PD-L1 expression analyses in pre-treatment samples are in process. Eleven (55%) patients did not receive planned radiotherapy after surgery based on the pathologic responses. No recurrences have been observed with a median follow up of 3.8 months (range: 1.5-11.2).
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant cemiplimab was well-tolerated and induced a pCR or MPR in 70% of stage III/IV (M0) CSCC patients. A multicenter phase II study is planned to confirm these results and to describe the ability of neoadjuvant cemiplimab to allow less extensive treatment.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03565783.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Funding
Regeneron.
Disclosure
N. Gross: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Regeneron; Advisory / Consultancy: PDS Biotechnology; Advisory / Consultancy: Intuitive Surgical. B.S. Glisson: Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): ISA Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5704 - Safety and Efficacy of TRIplet combination of Nivolumab (N) with Dabrafenib (D) and Trametinib (T) [TRIDeNT] in Patients (pts) with BRAF-mutated Metastatic Melanoma (MM): A Single Center Phase II Study
Presenter: Elizabeth Burton
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
4298 - 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and long-term toxicity of (neo)adjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) + nivolumab (NIVO) in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN trial)
Presenter: Christian Blank
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
4560 - Cell Phenotypes Associated with Response and Toxicity Defined by High Resolution Flow Cytometry in Melanoma Patients receiving Checkpoint Inhibition
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
4008 - Unsorted single-cell RNA sequencing profiles of metastatic melanoma patients reveal the heterogeneity of melanoma-associated fibroblasts
Presenter: Krisztian Homicsko
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
4800 - Plasma proteomics in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Hanna Eriksson
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
1090 - Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in combination (combo) with ipilimumab (ipi) versus ipi alone for advanced melanoma: 3-year landmark analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
Presenter: Jason Chesney
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
1989 - Phase II multicenter open label study of pembrolizumab and entinostat in adult patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (PEMDAC study)
Presenter: Henrik Jespersen
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
3622 - Pembrolizumab for Recurrent/Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): Efficacy and Safety Results From the Phase 2 KEYNOTE-629 Study
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
3904 - SELPAC - a 3 arm randomised Phase II study of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib alone or in combination with paclitaxel (PT) in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM)
Presenter: Paul Nathan
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract
1739 - 18-months relapse-free survival (RFS) and biomarker analyses of OpACIN-neo: a study to identify the optimal dosing schedule of neoadjuvant (neoadj) Ipilimumab (IPI) + Nivolumab (NIVO) in stage III melanoma
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Discussion – Melanoma and other skin tumours
Resources:
Abstract