Abstract 2162
Background
Given rising cancer drug costs, US Medicare recently proposed to tie some drug prices to average prices paid by comparable countries. To understand the potential scope of this policy, we assessed differences in cancer drug prices in the US and European countries. We also evaluated the correlation between drug prices and their clinical benefit, as measured by two value frameworks: the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework v2 (ASCO VF) and the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale v1.1 (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods
We identified all new drugs for adult solid and hematologic cancers, approved by the FDA from 2009-2017 and that have also been approved by the EMA by December 31, 2018. US average sales prices (and if not available, wholesale acquisition costs) were extracted as of February 1, 2019, and compared to comparable currency-adjusted ex-factory drug costs in England, France, Germany, and Switzerland. ASCO VF and ESMO-MCBS scores were assessed for pivotal trials supporting solid tumor drugs; in case of multiple trials, we focused on the highest score. Consistent with the developers of the rating scales, “high benefit” was defined as scores of A-B (neo/adjuvant setting) and 4-5 (palliative setting) on the ESMO-MCBS scale and scores ≥45 on the ASCO VF. Linear regression models and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and were used to assess the association between drug prices and benefit scores.
Results
The study cohort included 63 drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA during the study period. 46 (73%) were approved for solid tumors, and 17 (27%) were approved for hematologic malignancies. Overall, median cancer drug prices in Europe were 52% (interquartile range: 37-72%) lower than US prices. There was no association between monthly treatment cost and ASCO-VF or ESMO-MCBS scores in any country. There was also no association between price differential between US and median European drug prices and either ASCO-VF (P = 0.599) or ESMO-MBCS (P = 0.321) scores.
Conclusions
Drug prices of cancer drugs were not associated with clinical benefit in the US or in European countries. Cancer drug prices in the US were significantly higher than in the compared European countries.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Zurich.
Funding
Swiss Cancer League.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4743 - Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada
Presenter: Joanna Gotfrit
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
6081 - Biosimilar Substitution: European Prescriber Perspectives
Presenter: Michael Reilly
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1218 - Cost avoided in drugs derived from participation in clinical trials in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Luis Sánchez- Rubio Ferrández
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3453 - Accessibility and Affordability to Trastuzumab for Breast cancer patients: voices of the Global Oncology community from ONCOLLEGE 001 survey – part 2
Presenter: Sara Altuna
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
3302 - Poster Discussion - Public policy - Analysis of 105.000 cancer patients; have they been discussed in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings? A nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Janneke Walraven
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5246 - Reaching sustainable oncology care via the National Cancer Control Program (NCCP)
Presenter: Branko Zakotnik
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5586 - Changing landscape of clinical cancer trials in Germany
Presenter: Susen Burock
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5192 - Comparison between phase III randomized clinical trials and their preceeding phase II studies.
Presenter: Ivan Lyra-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
5811 - Projecting overall survival data for health-economic models in oncology: do maturity levels impact uncertainty?
Presenter: Isabelle Borget
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract
1801 - Implementation Frameworks to effectively transition complex research interventions into clinical practice in Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; A scoping Systematic Review
Presenter: Gayathri Delanerolle
Session: Poster Discussion - Public policy
Resources:
Abstract