Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

150P - Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Her2 positive breast cancer, efficacy of biosimilar compared to Herceptin®

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Nassima Kouadri

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101220-101220. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101220

Authors

N. Kouadri1, N.N. Belili1, A. Boudersa2, K. Cheikchouk1, M. Ressa3, M. Ghassoul3, S. Bouacha4, D. Hanene2, T. FILALI5

Author affiliations

  • 1 CHU Ibn Rochd - Annaba, Annaba/DZ
  • 2 Badji Mokhtar-Annaba University, Annaba/DZ
  • 3 UH Ibn Rochd, Annaba/DZ
  • 4 EPH ancien hopital, Souk ahras/DZ
  • 5 Université Mentouri de Constantine 3, Constantine/DZ

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 150P

Background

Trastuzumab biosimilar were first tested and introduced in the metastatic setting. There use in the neoadjuant setting is based on equivalence on pathological complete response rate (pCR), which remain the preferable surrograte factor in Her2-positive tumors. Two biosimilars are available at ower institution since 2017 (Hertraz® 440mg Mylan and CanMab ® AbdiBrahim). The aim of this study is to compre efficacy of trastuzumab biosimilar compared to Referent Trastuzumab based on pCR.

Methods

A retrospctive study was conducted based on 193 files of stage I-III her2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) including trastuzumab only, since pertuzumab is not available at our level. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were compared. A first analyse of relatio between the use trastuzumab and pCR rate was done, then a multivariate analysis added to this parameter significant predictive factors (TNM stage, molecular sub-groupe, ER/PR levels, Ki67, histology).

Results

A total of 99 patients includes in the Referent group and 94 in the biosimilars group. Baseline characteristics are summarized in the table.

Table: 150P

Referent trastuzumab Biosimilars
Median age (min-max) 48.1 52.4
Premenopusal (%) 59.6 55.3
T: T1-2-3-4 (%) 6.1-44.4-22.3-28.3 3.2-28.7-31.9-36.2
N: 0-1-2-3 (%) 36.4-53.5-10.6-0 35.1-47.9-6.4-10.6
Stage: I-IIA-IIB-IIIA-IIIB-IIIC (%) 6.1-25.2-24.2-20.2-24.2-0 1.1-19.1-25.5-15.9-27.6-10.6
Histology: IDC-ILC-Other (%) 83.8-14.1-2 89.4-7.4-3.2
ER (median) 30.5% 42.5%
PR (median) 20.6% 30.1%
Ki67 (median) 37.4% 37.3%
Molecular group (Luminal) 52.5% 71.3%

We noticed a statistically significant difference between luminal rate in the two arms (p=0.021) pCR rate in biosimilar arm was 41.5% vs 37.8% in the Referent groupe (p=0.331). In multivariate analysis none of the cited parameters was considered as a predictive factor of pCR.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab biosomilar compared to Referent trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting, since the two arms whowed comparable pCR rates, even if more luminal tumors were recorded in the biosimilar arm, considered as resistance factor to neoadjuvant treatment. This is an important result considering different cost of the two options.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.