Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

140P - Use of chemotherapy and loco-regional therapy for stage IA triple-negative breast cancer and their association with oncologic outcomes: A cancer registry study

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Andre Pfob

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-25. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103096

Authors

A. Pfob1, I. Surovtsova2, D. Kokh3, J. Heil4, M. Banys- Paluchowski5, P. Morakis3

Author affiliations

  • 1 University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg/DE
  • 2 Clinical State Registry Baden-Württemberg, 70191 - Stuttgart/DE
  • 3 Clinical State Registry Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart/DE
  • 4 Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg/DE
  • 5 UKSH - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 140P

Background

We aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and loco-regional therapy for stage IA (pT1, pN0) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a real-world setting.

Methods

We identified patients with pT1, pN0 TNBC diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 within the clinical cancer registry of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and multivariate Cox regression models (adjusted for age, use of chemotherapy, local therapy (breast conserving therapy [breast conserving surgery + radiotherapy] vs. mastectomy), and tumor histologic subtype).

Results

A total of 1191 patients with a median follow-up of 43.8 months were identified: 0.9% (11 of 1191) with pT1mi stage, 10.0% (119 of 1191) with pT1a, 24.0% (286 of 1191) with pT Ib, and 65.0% (775 of 1191) with pT1c. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy was 9.1% (1 of 11) in pT1mi stage, 41.2% (49 of 119) in pT1a, 66.8% (191 of 286) in pT Ib, and 69.8% (541 of 775) in pT1c. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no significant influence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in pT1a and pT Ib patients (for pT1a HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 8.50, for pT Ib HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.30) but for patient age in the pT Ib group (HR 4.71, 95% CI 2.26 to 9.8, for age ≥70 vs. <70 years). For pT1c patients, there was significant influence for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.8), for local therapy (HR 0.41, 95% 0.25 to 0.69, for breast conserving therapy vs. mastectomy only), and patient age (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.39 for age ≥70 vs. <70 years). Notably, for pT1c patients aged <70years, local therapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69), in favor of breast conserving therapy) but not use of chemotherapy (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.56-2.19) was associated with OS.

Conclusions

This data suggests that OS in stage IA TNBC is strongly influenced by local therapy and patient age, but not use of chemotherapy. Larger studies with longer-term follow-up are welcomed to fully inform this discussion.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Heidelberg University Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.