Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

103P - PET-CT in localized breast cancer: Does it impact on the therapeutic decision?

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Paula Rodríguez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103095

Authors

P. Rodríguez1, R. Buezas Perez1, M. Cejuela2, A. Falcon Gonzalez1, A. Gil Torralvo1, M. Benavent Viñuales3, R.M. Alvarez1, C. Cases1, M. Ruiz Borrego4, F.J. Salvador Bofill5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville/ES
  • 2 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 8908 - Seville/ES
  • 3 University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Seville/ES
  • 4 Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 - Seville/ES
  • 5 Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, 41013 - Seville/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 103P

Background

The incidence of early breast cancer has increased since mammography screening. Accurate staging is essential to determine optimal treatment. Contrast enhanced mammography (Mx), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound (US) are the gold standard for locoregional staging. Computed tomography (CT) staging is also indicated in high-risk cases. However, the increasing availability of PET-CT has challenged its use in early breast cancer.

Methods

A search was conducted for patients with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer at Hospital Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain) from March 2017 to March 2023. Those who had PET-CT at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant treatment were selected and followed retrospectively We aimed to determine the concordance in staging between standard radiological assessment and PET-CT and its implications for therapeutic approach in our population. Also correlating PET-CT staging after neoadjuvant treatment and surgical staging in this group.

Results

63 patients were identified. All were female. Median age was 51. Regarding tumor phenotype, 47 (74.6%) cases were luminal, 3 (4.8%) HER2 positive and 13 (20.6%) triple negative. By radiological techniques, 3.7% of patients were stage I, 32% stage IIA, 24.5% stage IIB, 20.7% stage IIIA, 7.5% stage IIIB, 11.3% stage IIIC and 1 (3.2%) patient stage IV In 54 patients with baseline US, PET-CT increased nodal staging from N1 to N2/N3 in 6 cases and decreased from N2 to N1 in 1 case. The correlation in staging between baseline radiologic techniques and PET-CT was 73.02% (k=0.61) for tumor size and 64.5% (k=0.42) for nodal assessment. Changes in PET-CT staging led to therapeutic modifications in 9 (14.3%) patients. Axillary staging correlated with PET-CT in 30 patients (90.9%) of the 33 patients who underwent post-neoadjuvant axillary US. 23 patients (33.3%) had a complete pathologic response in the surgical specimen. Of these, 19 patients had a complete response by PET-CT and 11 by standard evaluation.

Conclusions

In our sample, PET-CT appears to increase sensitivity in preoperative staging, leading to a change in patient management in 14.3% of cases. It also shows a high correlation with surgical pathologic response.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Cejuela: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Travel: Novartis, Daiichi, Pfizer, Gilead. A. Falcon Gonzalez: Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker’s Bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Seagen, Roche, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Grünenthal; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Esteve. A. Gil Torralvo: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Travel: Novartis. M. Ruiz Borrego: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis, Daiichi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Speaker’s Bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Daiichi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Principal Investigator: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Travel: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.