Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

253P - Patient-centric approach: Examining quality-of-life incorporation in 5-year phase III metastatic breast cancer trials

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Shreyas Kalantri

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-47. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103200

Authors

S. Kalantri1, C. Sainatham2, J. Reddy Tallapalli3, S. Reddy Sripathi3, Z. Liu1, M. Kong1, E. Riley1

Author affiliations

  • 1 University of Louisville, Louisville/US
  • 2 Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore/US
  • 3 Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 253P

Background

Metastatic breast cancer presents a significant challenge in oncology, requiring tailored treatment approaches for diverse molecular subtypes. While assessing treatment outcomes, it's imperative to consider factors beyond survival metrics. Emphasizing patient-centered care, the integration of Quality of Life (QoL) assessments is crucial. The European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) includes criteria that highlight the importance of QoL improvement, particularly in non-curative settings. Our analysis suggests limited QoL incorporation in recent trials.

Methods

This study conducted a systematic review of phase III metastatic breast cancer trials conducted between 2019 and 2023, retrieved from PubMed. Subgroup analyses categorized trials by receptor status (HR+, HER2+, TNBC), publication year, journal impact factor, trial type (superiority vs. non-inferiority), and study outcome (positive vs. negative). QoL incorporation was assessed as an endpoint.

Results

Systematic review of 122 phase III metastatic breast cancer trials revealed limited integration of QoL assessments, with 36.9% of trials incorporating such endpoints. Subanalyses by receptor status showed 42.2% for HR+, 32.2% for HER2+, and 36.4% for TNBC trials incorporated QoL. Stratification by publication year exhibited variations: 33.3% in 2019, 48% in 2020, 39.5% in 2021, 24% in 2022, and 40% in 2023. Journal impact factor (IF) analysis indicated 37.2% in journals ≥10 IF and 36.6% in journals <10 IF included QoL. Furthermore, superiority trials had 33.7% and non-inferiority trials had 50% incorporating QoL assessments. Among positive studies, 32.9% included QoL, compared to 45% in negative trials.

Conclusions

Our study highlights a significant gap in incorporating QoL assessments in recent metastatic breast cancer trials. These findings underscore the need for a more comprehensive and standardized integration of QoL endpoints to enhance patient-centered care and treatment decision-making. Future research should prioritize holistic assessment of treatment outcomes to better address the multifaceted needs of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.