Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

174P - Modelling cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening: Mammography leads to substantial cost savings for breast cancer treatment

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Moira Rushton

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103181

Authors

M. Rushton1, J. Mainprize2, M.J. Yaffe3, J. Robinson4, E. Cordeiro5, N. Long Hook2, P. Williams5, N. Moideen4, J. Renaud4, J. Seely1, A. Wilkinson1

Author affiliations

  • 1 University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa/CA
  • 2 University of Toronto - St. George Campus, Toronto/CA
  • 3 Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto/CA
  • 4 The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa/CA
  • 5 The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, Ottawa/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 174P

Background

Controversies exist around the public health benefit of breast cancer (BC) screening. Early detection has proven benefits in terms of improved survival and decreased treatment morbidity. With recent advances in treatment and technologies resulting in increased costs for BC therapy, the cost effectiveness of screening is unknown. The purpose of this study was to use current BC treatment costs to determine cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening.

Methods

Contemporary Canadian cost estimates based on 2023 treatment standards were incorporated into user-created scenarios run on the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Statistics Canada OncoSim BC microsimulation model to estimate the impact of various regimens for screening on outcomes and on overall costs of screening and treatment. We ran four scenarios that simulated a birth cohort (aged 40 in 2015) for no screening, biennial screening (ages 50-74 and 40-74), and annual screening (age 40-74).

Results

Canadian per-case BC treatment costs tabulated in our previous work (all values in Canadian dollars, $1 CAD = $0.74 USD = € 0.68) increased markedly from $14,505 for in situ disease, $39,263, $76,446, $97,668 and $370,398 for Stages I through IV respectively. Costs also vary among subtypes; for Stage III, from $75,954 (HER2+) to $110,798 (triple negative) and $117,269 (HR+). Cost per screening mammogram was $71. Our analysis shows that for 1000 women, initially at age 40, the lifetime cost of screening varies from $0 (no screening), $810,000 (biennial 50-74), $1.14M (biennial 40-74) to $2.2M (annual 40-74) while corresponding therapy costs are $14.9M, $12.4M, $11.8M and $10.6M. Number of BC deaths averted per 1000 women screened for each schedule compared to no screening were 9.3, 11.0 and 14.3 respectively (life-years gained 113, 161, 214). Screening annually aged 40-74 is associated with a net savings of $1878/woman or $442.8M annually to the Canadian health system.

Conclusions

Although screening costs rise according to the number of lifetime screens, they are easily offset by reduced breast cancer therapy costs. Increased population level BC screening yields significant net savings to the health system while averting breast cancer deaths.

Editorial acknowledgement

OncoSim is led and supported by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, with model development by Statistics Canada, and is made possible through funding from Health Canada. The assumptions and calculations underlying the simulation results were prepared by the author(s), and the responsibility for the use and interpretation of these data and their reporting is entirely that of the authors.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.