Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

172P - MicroRNAs in nipple aspirate fluid hold promise as a novel screening diagnostic for early breast cancer detection: Results from a Dutch multicenter cross-sectional study

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Laura de Rooij

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103181

Authors

L.A. de Rooij1, L. Masselink1, S.I..S. Patuleia2, B. Penning de Vries1, S. Elias1, J. van Gorp3, J.V. Steenhoven2, T. Van Dalen4, L. Veenendaal5, C.C. Van der Pol6, E. van der Wall1, P. van Diest7, C. Moelans1

Author affiliations

  • 1 UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht/NL
  • 2 UMC-University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht/NL
  • 3 St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein/NL
  • 4 Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht/NL
  • 5 Alexander Monro Ziekenhuis, Bilthoven/NL
  • 6 Alrijne Hospital Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp/NL
  • 7 UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX - Utrecht/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 172P

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Five-year overall survival has increased to 88%, due to screening programs and better treatment options. Nonetheless, interval cancers (BC diagnosed between routine screening moments) occur, implying that current standards are suboptimal. A possible solution could be to detect biomarkers in biofluids, such as nipple aspirate fluid (NAF). NAF is present in the ductal system of the breast, can be obtained non-invasively, and harbors different biomarkers, including microRNAs (miRNAs). In this study, we evaluated the biomarker potential of miRNAs in NAF for the detection of BC.

Methods

A case-control study was used to assess the differences in miRNA expression between sporadic BC patients (n=116 with successful NAF collection from affected breast) and healthy controls (n=111). A 24 miRNA panel, selected based on literature research and preliminary data, was analysed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were utilized to determine the prediction accuracy of the miRNA panel.

Results

Data from 21 miRNAs resulted in an AUC of >0.8, indicating great diagnostic potential. When overfitting was corrected by cross validation, this AUC drops with ∼0.1. These results indicate that the nipple fluid derived miRNAs are able to differentiate between women with BC and healthy controls. A paired analysis within BC patients was also performed, where the affected breast was compared to the contralateral (unaffected) breast. This analysis showed an AUC of <0.6. Therefore, the affected breast cannot be accurately determined solely using the miRNA panel.

Conclusions

In conclusion, a pre-selected miRNA panel is able to discriminate between NAF samples obtained from BC patients and healthy controls. Assessment of this miRNA panel in NAF could be a promising tool for future (add-on) screening. Therefore, the 21-miRNA panel is currently being assessed in prospectively collected NAF samples from women at increased risk of developing BC. This nested case-control analysis will provide valuable information on the ability of the panel to detect BC in its earliest stages.

Clinical trial identification

CCMO NL57343.041.16; Dutch Trial Register NTR6162/ NL6031: the ORNAMENT study trial: a multicenter, crOss sectional, study to assess microRNA expression in Nipple Aspirate Fluid, blood and tuMor material in women with primary brEast caNcer compared with healthy conTrols. Release data: 12-12-2016 CCMO NL41845.041.12; Dutch Trial Register NL8987: Breast Cancer Biomarkers in Nipple Aspiration Fluid in Healthy Controls. Release data: 12-12-2018.

Legal entity responsible for the study

University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht).

Funding

Stichting Vrienden, UMC Utrecht.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.