Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

243P - Identifying the communication needs of people living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in Ireland: An all-Ireland patient-led survey (CTRIAL-IE 23-05)

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Seamus O'Reilly

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-47. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103200

Authors

C. Weadick1, S. Gaynor2, E. Mulvaney3, F.K. Duane4, R. Keogh5, H. Greally6, M.J. O’leary7, Y. O'Meara8, J.A. McBrien9, E. Mulroe3, I. Beristain3, I. Teiserskyte3, J. Marron3, S. McLoughlin2, V. Donachie3, S. O'Reilly10

Author affiliations

  • 1 CUH - Cork University Hospital, Cork/IE
  • 2 Cancer Trials Ireland, St Stephens Green/IE
  • 3 Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin/IE
  • 4 St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network and Trinity St. James' Cancer Institute, Dublin/IE
  • 5 Galway University Hospital, D09 FT51 - Galway/IE
  • 6 Cancer Care West, Galway/IE
  • 7 Marymount University Hospital & Hospice, Cork/IE
  • 8 University College Dublin, Dublin/IE
  • 9 Metastatic Breast Cancer Patient, Belfast/GB
  • 10 Cancer Trials Ireland and Cork University Hospital, Dublin/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 243P

Background

Therapeutic advances have improved MBC survival rates but patient expressed communication needs have not been evaluated in Ireland to date. Heretofore, the patient’s voice has not been central to such an assessment, compromising MBC care.

Methods

An anonymous online survey in 9 domains was designed by a cohort of 30 MBC patients facilitated by a multidisciplinary group. Patients with MBC ≥ 18 years living on the Island of Ireland were eligible to participate. The survey consisted of a mixture of open and closed questions and results were summarized by counts and percentages for categorical variables and by mean, standard deviation, median and range for continuous variables.

Results

Between July-October 2023, 246 patients completed the survey. The median age was 52.5. 79% report receiving their initial MBC diagnosis by a consultant with 59% reporting a family member with them. For 63% this discussion occurred in a clinic room, with 12% receiving this news by phone. The majority (74%) felt that adequate time was taken for this discussion. Over 77% are interested in finding out more about their prognosis. Of these, 50% already know their prognosis and this information was received equally from their medical team or by researching themselves. 27% of patients want to know more about their prognosis but have not received any information. Of those that already know their prognosis, 40% felt the optimal time to discuss prognosis was at diagnosis, with 22% preferring to discuss in the weeks to 3 months following diagnosis. On discussing prognosis, 64% preferred the opportunity to have someone with them, 58% preferred to be asked if this was something that they wished to know and 43% preferred to be notified in advance that their prognosis would be discussed. Over 49% of patients would like advice on how to speak with close family and friends regarding their diagnosis and prognosis.

Conclusions

The majority of patients are satisfied with the manner of disclosure of MBC and want to know their prognosis. Guided by the patient voice, potential practice changing findings include changing to an opt-out disclosure model for prognosis, curated information sources about MBC and advice on informing family / community members.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Cancer Trials Ireland.

Funding

Irish Cancer Society.

Disclosure

R. Keogh: Financial Interests, Personal, Sponsor/Funding, Travel, Accommodation, Expenses: MSD, Janssen. Y. O'Meara: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Mater Private Hospital. V. Donachie: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: CSL Vifor, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: CSL Vifor; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research Funding: AstraZeneca. S. O'Reilly: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data Monitoring Committee Membership: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel expenses: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel: Novartis, Nordic Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, ad board: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Funding for Educational Meetings: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors, Member Executive Board: Breast International Group; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Advisory Board Member: Irish Cancer Society; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Clinical Lead: Cancer Trials Ireland; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Cork Arc Cancer Support House; Non-Financial Interests, Other, Advisory Board Member: National Cancer Registry. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.