Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

240P - Age at diagnosis and survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Kristen Brantley

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-47. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103200

Authors

K.D. Brantley1, G.J. Kirkner1, M. Hughes2, L. Varella1, G. Suggs2, O. Cunningham1, S. Sammons2, A.H. Partridge2, N.U. Lin3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston/US
  • 2 Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston/US
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02215 - Boston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 240P

Background

The influence of age at diagnosis (dx) on prognosis of MBC patients remains unclear. While recent studies report better overall survival (OS) for younger women, they use primary v. metastatic tumor subtype, lack differentiation of luminal A v. B subtypes, and/or include only de novo patients.

Methods

We examined OS by age at dx of MBC in the Ending Metastatic Breast Cancer for Everyone (EMBRACE) cohort, an ongoing prospective study of MBC patients seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute which collects clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed OS by age (<=40 years (y), 41-55 y, and >55 y) and within inferred metastatic tumor molecular subtype (luminal A, HER2- luminal B, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, triple negative (TN)). Univariate Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS by clinical factors. A multivariate Cox model tested the association between age group at MBC dx and OS adjusting for metastatic tumor inferred subtype, primary tumor grade, disease-free interval (DFI, defined as: de novo,>0-2 y, >=2 y), and number and type of metastatic sites at MBC dx.

Results

Out of 4, 397 women in EMBRACE, 2, 268 (52%) died in follow-up (median=5.2 y (inter-quartile range (IQR)=2.1-9.7 y). At MBC diagnosis, 578 women were <=40 y, 995 were 41-55 y, and 2, 824 were >55 y. Compared to older women, younger women were more likely to have de novo disease, shorter DFI if recurrent, and brain or liver metastases (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, age was not associated with OS; all other included factors were significantly associated with OS. Factors most strongly associated with worse OS included luminal B (HR (95% CI) v. luminal A= 1.44 (1.24-1.66)) or TN (HR=2.98 (2.55-3.47)) metastatic tumor subtype, recurrent disease and DFI <2 years (HR v. de novo=2.15 (1.87-2.47)), and brain (HR=1.61 (1.39-1.88)) or liver (HR=1.71 (1.55-1.89)) metastasis.

Conclusions

Survival following MBC did not differ by age at diagnosis after accounting for clinical factors. Notably, women with luminal B-like tumors experienced significantly worse OS than luminal A-like tumors regardless of age, highlighting the need to develop more effective therapies for this tumor subtype.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

NCCN/Pfizer Independent Grants for Learning & Change; Saverin Breast Cancer Research Fund; Pan-Mass Challenge (Team Duncan).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.