Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Lunch and Poster Display session

234P - A retrospective analysis to assess the impact of interaction between CDK4/6 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcomes in metastatic breast cancer patients

Date

16 May 2024

Session

Lunch and Poster Display session

Presenters

Maitreyee Rai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_4): 1-47. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103200

Authors

M. Rai1, R. Dileo2, P. Asawa3, R. Sweeney2, S. Shah2, H. Karakilic2, Y. Yin2, C. Hilton1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh/US
  • 2 Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh/US
  • 3 University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center /Hollywood, Hollywood/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 234P

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with drug interactions resulting in decreased bioavailability of many anticancer drugs. Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are approved in combination with aromatase inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The data comparing the CDK4/6i interactions with PPIs and its impact on clinical outcomes is sparse. We present the following study comparing CDK4/6i and their interaction with PPIs to determine the efficacy of their concurrent use.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study. Patients in age group 18-90 years, with HR-positive, HER2-negative mBC treated with either of the 2 CDK4/6i (palbociclib and abemaciclib) from January 2017 to August 2022 were included. Clinical and demographic data was obtained by chart review. The primary outcome was to compare the median progression-free survival (mPFS) for patients on CDK4/6i with PPI versus without PPI. The secondary outcome was to compare the mPFS for the 2 CDK4/6i, stratified based on PPI use.

Results

281 patients were included (277 females and 4 males), mean age of 67.51 years. 191 patients received PPI with CDK 4/6i. There was no difference in mPFS between the groups receiving CDK4/6i with and without PPI, 18 vs 17 months, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that overall risk of progression was 17% lower in the group receiving PPI (Table). Patients on palbociclib and abemaciclib had higher mPFS with concomitant administration of PPI (p-value 0.2405 and 0.6561, respectively). Table: 234P

mPFS (in months) in the CDK4/6i groups

mPFS with PPI mPFS without PPI Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis for risk of progression
All CDK4/6i 18 17 HR 0.83 [0.60, 1.14], p = 0.2518
Palbociclib 19 19 HR 0.81[0.56, 1.16], p = 0.2490
Abemaciclib 11 10 HR 0.84 [0.38, 1.86], p = 0.6665

Conclusions

Our study results did not reveal a significant difference in mPFS between patients who received CDK4/6i with or without PPI. However, our study had a small sample size and short duration of follow-up. Further studies are warranted to establish the relationship of CDK4/6i and PPI interaction with clinical outcomes.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

C. Hilton: Other, Advisory Role: John Hopkins Hospital, Curio Science, Gilead Sciences, Biotheranostics, AstraZeneca; Other, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo; Other: Gilead Sciences, Clinical Education Alliance, Targeted Oncology, OncLive/MJH Life Sciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.