Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

216P - Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple negative breast cancer: efficacy -with a focus on brain metastases- and toxicity in a real-world cohort

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Delphine Loirat

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101223-101223. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101223

Authors

D. Loirat1, A. De Moura1, S. Korbi1, N. Kiavue2, L. Escalup1, R. Desmaris1, L. Cabel1, P. Vaflard3, P.H. Cottu1, J. Pierga1, F.C. Bidard4, S. Vaillant1, A. Acramel1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Institut Curie, Paris/FR
  • 2 Hopital René Huguenin - Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud/FR
  • 3 Institut Curie, 75005 - Paris/FR
  • 4 Institut Curie, 75248 - Paris/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 216P

Background

ASCENT demonstrated the efficacy of Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), and led to EMA approval in November 2021.

Methods

We set up an ambispective bicentric cohort study to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of SG in pts with mTNBC. This study included pts treated through the French Early Access Program from May 2021 to January 2023. Pts provided written consent for their clinical data to be reported.

Results

The cohort included 103 pts with a median age of 55 years [26-89]; 7/74 pts (9%) had BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutation, 15 pts (15%) de novo metastatic disease and 32 pts (31%) brain metastases. Pts had previously received a median of 2 lines [1-10] of treatment in advanced setting, 29 pts (28%) and 6 pts (6%) had previously received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and PARP inhibitors respectively. After a median follow-up of 9.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.0 months (95%CI[3.4-5.3]) and 9.2 months (95%CI[7.2-NR]) respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 30% (2 pts achieved a complete response). Among pts with brain metastases, median PFS was 3.7 months (95%CI[2.6-6.2]) and OS 6.7 months (95%CI[6.3-NR]). Of 103 treated pts, 78 pts (76%) discontinued SG due to progressive disease (73 pts, 94%), toxicity (1 pt, 1%), physical deterioration (3 pts, 4%) or the patient’s request (1 pt, 1%). Twenty-five pts (24%) were on treatment at data cut-off. The median duration of treatment was 3 months, corresponding to 6 cycles of SG. Dose reductions were required in 19 pts (18%) within a median of 2 cycles [2-11], due to gastrointestinal toxicity (6 pts), hematological toxicity (8 pts), liver enzyme elevation (1 pt), febrile neutropenia (3 pts), and physical deterioration (1 pt). There was no related death to SG.

Conclusions

Our real-world data in mTNBC pts are consistent with results of the ASCENT trial in terms of ORR and safety, but observed PFS and OS are numerically shorter, including pts with brain metastases.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Institut Curie.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D. Loirat: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Travel expenses, Honoraria: MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Honoraria: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Travel expenses,: Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel expenses, Honoraria: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria, Travel expenses: Seagen, Exact Sciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: EISAI. L. Escalup: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Mylan. P. Vaflard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Gilead. P.H. Cottu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Travel/Accomodation, honoraria: Pfizer, Roche/Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, honoraria: Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, honoraria: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Seagen, NanoString Technologies, Pierre Fabre. J. Pierga: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Honoraria, Travel expenses: Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, HonorariaTravel expenses: Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, MSD, Seattle Genetics, Eisai, Pierre Fabre Oncologie; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Honoraria: Gilead. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.