Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

210P - Real-world outcomes in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and germline/tumour BRCA mutations (g/tBRCA1/2m) receiving 1st-line (1L) CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy (ET)

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Anton Safonov

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101223-101223. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101223

Authors

A. Safonov1, E. Nizialek2, I. Gibson3, S. Khosla3, E. Sofianopoulou4, N. Lukashchuk3, J.S. Brown3, M. Robson5, P. Razavi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York/US
  • 2 AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg/US
  • 3 AstraZeneca, Cambridge/GB
  • 4 AstraZeneca, UB5 4BW - Cambridge/GB
  • 5 MSKCC - Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 210P

Background

CDK4/6i + ET are recommended as 1L treatment in pts with HR+ HER2– mBC. However, treatment outcome in pts with BRCA1/2m (∼8% of pts) is not well understood. Here we report real-world (RW) outcomes to 1L CDK4/6i + ET by BRCA1/2m status from a large clinical-genomic database.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of pts with HR+ HER2– mBC who received 1L CDK4/6i + ET captured in the Flatiron Health Data Repository from Jan 2011–June 2022. Primary endpoint was RW progression-free survival (PFS); RW overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV; adjusted for ET and CDK4/6i) Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes in pts with deleterious g/tBRCA1/2m vs BRCAwt/unknown (unk) mutational status.

Results

The study included 4609 pts (145 BRCA1/2m and 4464 BRCAwt/unk); 4429 were evaluable for survival (141 and 4288, respectively). Compared to BRCAwt/unk, pts with BRCA1/2m had shorter PFS (14.3 [BRCA1/2m] vs 22.0 [BRCAwt/unk] months; UV hazard ratio [HR; 97.5% CI]: 1.95 [1.59–2.38], p≤0.0001; MV HR: 1.93 [1.70–2.36], p<0.0001) and OS (40.7 [BRCA1/2m] vs 49.7 [BRCAwt/unk] months; UV HR [95% CI]: 1.22 [0.95–1.23], p=0.122; MV HR: 1.21 [0.95–1.53], p=0.129). Further stratification of PFS mutation type and ET backbone is shown (Table). mPFS was consistently lower in pts with BRCA1/2m regardless of mutation type (g/t, BRCA1/BRCA2) and ET partner than in pts with BRCAwt/unk.

Conclusions

Pts with BRCA1/2m had significantly worse PFS outcomes with 1L CDK4/6i + ET than pts with BRCAwt/unk status. OS was also numerically lower in the BRCA1/2m cohort. Reductions in PFS were observed irrespective of mutation type (g/t or BRCA1/BRCA2) and ET partner. Optimised 1L treatment options are needed for pts with g/tBRCA1/2m HR+ HER2– mBC. Further research is needed to see if a similar trend is observed in early breast cancer.

Table: 210P

Events/N Median (95% CI); months
Adjusted PFS
BRCAwt/unk 1922/4288 22.0 (20.7–23.7)
BRCAwt 1105/2123 18.2 (16.9–20.1)
BRCAunk 817/2165 29.9 (26.9–33.6)
BRCA1/2m 99/141 14.3 (10.0–16.5)
gBRCA1/2m 55/78 12.4 (9.0–17.8)
tBRCA1/2m 44/63 15.1 (8.2–18.0)
BRCA1m 19/31 9.7 (7.2–18.4)
BRCA2m 75/102 14.3 (8.3–17.5)
BRCA1/2m 5/8 NA
PFS by ET partner
Fulvestrant BRCAwt/unk 638/1298 18.0 (16.2–21.0)
BRCA1/2m 36/45 8.9 (5.3–17.8)
Non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor BRCAwt/unk 1241/2857 24.5 (22.0–27.4)
BRCA1/2m 63/92 14.6 (11.0–18.4)
Other BRCAwt/unk 43/133 23.4 (16.1–NA)
BRCA1/2m 0/4 NA
OS
BRCAwt/unk 1726/4288 49.7 (48.3–53.1)
BRCA1/2m 69/141 40.7 (31.0–51.5)
NA, non-analysable

Editorial acknowledgement

AstraZeneca-funded medical writing support was provided by Suzanne Patel, Ph.D., from BOLDSCIENCE Inc.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

E. Nizialek, I. Gibson: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca. S. Khosla: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Leadership Role: AstraZeneca. E. Sofianopoulou, N. Lukashchuk, J.S. Brown: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. M. Robson: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Review guideline pathways: Change Healthcare; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Speaker at CME events (NOT speaker's bureau): Physician's Education Resource, Research to Practice, Intellisphere, MJH Holdings; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Speaker at CME events (NOT speaker's bureau): MyMedEd; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Funding for research study (ICEBERG, dating to 2007): AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Steering Committee Member for CAPITELLO-290, uncompensated: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Co-PI for Merck IIT of neoadjuvant olaparib/pembrolizumab in BRCA carriers, no personal compensation: Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Steering Committee member for KEYLNK-009, no compensation: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Local PI of KEYLNK009: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Local co-PI of clinical trial of ZEN03694 and talazoparib in TNBC, no personal compensation: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Zenith Pharmaceuticals, Epic Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Tempus Labs; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Editorial services for writing of reports for ABRAZO clinical trial: Pfizer; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Editorial services for medical writing of reports resulting from OlympiAD trial: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO. P. Razavi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Epic Science, Inivata, SAGA Diagnostics, Prelude Theraputics, Paige.ai; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Odyssey Biosciences; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Grail Inc., Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Tempus, Guardant, Biotherenostics, Epic Sciences, Inviate; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role: Tempus. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.