Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

149P - HER2-low status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Gulin Alkan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101220-101220. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101220

Authors

G. Alkan1, N. Senturk Oztas1, E. Degerli1, S. Safarov1, M. Guliyev2, M. Gunaltili1, G. Can1, N.S. Demirci1, Z.H. Turna1, F.H. Demirelli1, M. Özgüroglu2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul/TR
  • 2 Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul/TR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 149P

Background

Some recent evidence has suggested that HER2-low breast cancers (BC) are distinct entities. The prognostic impact of low expression of HER-2 are not yet well defined, and inconsistent results were reported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of low HER-2 status on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative BC patients treated with NACT from 2017 to 2022 in a single academic center. HER-2 low status was defined by IHC +1 or +2 ISH non-amplified, and HER2-zero was defined by IHC 0. The primary objective was to compare pathological complete response (pCR) rates between HER2-low and HER2-zero populations.

Results

101 patients were identified. 70 (69.3%) patients had hormone receptor (HR) positivity, and 31 (30.7%) patients had TNBC. Overall 70 (69.3%) patients were HER2-zero and 31 (30.7%) patients were HER2-low. Among HR-positive patients, 25 (35.7%) were HER2-low, while only 6 (19.3%) patients were her2 low in TNBC group,There were no significant differences in median age, Ki67 score, histology, menopausal status, histologic grade, or T stage between the HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. There were also ER level differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumors; the median ER level was 75% for HER2-zero tumors and 90% for HER2-low tumors (p = 0.028). Overall, pCR was achieved in 24 (23.7%) patients. Among HER2-zero patients 21 (30%) had pCR while 3 (9.7%) patients had pCR in the HER2-low group (p=0.027). In the HR-positive subtype, there were still statistically significant pCR differences between the two groups. 15 patients had pCR in the HR-positive group; among these, 13 (87%) patients had HER2-zero tumors, while 2 (13%) of them had HER2-low tumors (p = 0.041). In the TNBC subtype, 9 patients had pCR; 8 (89%) of them had HER2 zero and 1 (11%) had HER2-low tumors, but there was no statistical significance in the TNBC group (p = 0.642).

Conclusions

Our results show that HER2-low tumors have a different response to NACT. Both in the overall group and the HR-positive subgroup, HER2-low tumors had significantly lower pCR rates. Because of the cross-talk between HR signaling and HER2 signaling, low HER2 expression may be responsible for treatment resistance in HR-positive BC.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.