Abstract 111P
Background
Goserelin 10.8 mg 3-monthly depot demonstrated non-inferior to 3.6 mg monthly depot in randomized clinical trials. This first retrospective, observational, non-inferiority, real-world study compared effectiveness of goserelin 10.8 mg 3-monthly depot to 3.6 mg monthly depot in breast cancer (BC) patients.
Methods
Data were extracted from electronic records of pre- and perimenopausal BC patients who received the first dose of goserelin between January 2015 to December 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, China. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority analysis of proportion of patients with serum estradiol (E2) suppression. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) for early BC, progression-free survival (PFS) for advanced BC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics considering age, prior chemotherapy, and BMI as covariates with caliper of -25%. P <0.05 was statistically significant. Non-inferiority was calculated using the risk difference (RD) by Miettinen-Nurminen method. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the independent factors (age, chemotherapy, BMI, stage, and radiotherapy) associated with E2 suppression.
Results
In total, 240 (goserelin 10.8 mg, n = 143; goserelin 3.6 mg, n = 97) HR+ BC patients with E2 tests were included. Post PSM, 96 patients in each group were considered for the primary analysis. E2 suppression rate was 98.96% in goserelin 10.8 mg and 92.71% in goserelin 3.6 mg with a RD of 0.065 (95%CI: 0.021, 0.135; P=0.0187), confirming the non-inferiority between the goserelin 10.8mg and goserelin 3.6mg groups at a margin of -15%. None of the factors showed significant association with E2 suppression. Goserelin 10.8 mg vs 3.6 mg 5year OS, DFS, and 3.2year PFS rates were 96.6% vs 93.8%, 99.0% vs 96.7%, and 77.1% vs 80.0%, respectively.
Conclusions
Goserelin 10.8 mg was non-inferior to goserelin 3.6 mg in peri- and premenopausal BC patients in terms of E2 suppression.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81974444, Xinhua Xie; No.82203569, Hao Wu).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.