Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing and lunch

170P - Comparison of the outcome between photo-medicine based dual method vs. RI method in axillary sentinel lymph node operation for breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Date

12 May 2023

Session

Poster viewing and lunch

Presenters

Jaeyeon Woo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_4): 101221-101221. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101221

Authors

J. Woo1, S. Jung2, J.H. Han2, E. Lee3, J.S. Yoo2, S. Kim2, E.S. Lee2, S. Lee2

Author affiliations

  • 1 National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang/KR
  • 2 NCC - National Cancer Center, Goyang/KR
  • 3 NCC - National Cancer Center, 10408 - Goyang/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 170P

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) has a problem of lower identification and higher false negative rates. To improve this, we compared the sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate between the dual method (DM) of indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-F) plus a radioisotope (RI) and RI alone. In this study, we aimed to compare the prognosis according to the SLN mapping method through the lymphedema(LE) Quality of Life(QoL) in the same patient group.

Methods

We analyzed 62 patients who completed LE examinations and a questionnaire. We defined LE as a volume difference between limbs of 200ml or more or a difference within a limb of 200mL or more. The limb volume was measured before and after surgery using volumetry. In addition, the ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) and single frequency bioelectrical impedance (SFBIA) at 1kHz and 5kHz was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for early detection of LE. We regarded ECW/TBW more than 0.39 as overhydrated and used the SFBIA ratio calculated as the ratio of the unaffected arm to the affected arm. QoL was assessed by the EORTC QLQ-BR23.

Results

Among the total of 62 patients, 26 were in the DM group and 36 were in the RI group. LE occurred in 11(42.3%) patients in the DM group and 12(33.3%) patients in the RI group, and there was no statistically significant difference(p=0.470). The number of patients with ECW/TBW greater than 0.39 was respectively 1(3.9%) and 4(11.1%) (p=0.388). The SFBIA ratio measured at 1kHz was 1.01 (0.99-1.03, p=0.994) in both groups, and the same value was shown at 5kHz (p=0.926). As a result of EORTC QLQ-BR23, there was no significant difference in breast and arm symptoms (breast symptoms 16.67 vs. 16.67 p=0.960, arm symptoms 33.33 vs. 33.33 p=0.724).

Conclusions

This study is a prospective study comparing the prognosis before and after surgery according to the SLN mapping method. Compared with RI, DM showed no significant difference in the number of retrieved LNs, LE, and related symptoms. We suggest DM is a useful method that provides visual guidance and is sufficient to replace the RI alone method.

Clinical trial identification

NCC2020-0233.

Legal entity responsible for the study

National Cancer Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.