Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

11P - Real-world analysis of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (ODX RS) indications and impact on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions: experience from the French LISE cohort

Date

04 May 2022

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Caroline Charles

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_3): S123-S147. 10.1016/annonc/annonc888

Authors

C. Charles1, B. Cutuli2

Author affiliations

  • 1 CHU de Montpellier - Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier, Cedex 5/FR
  • 2 ICC Institut du Cancer Courlancy REIMS, Reims/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 11P

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate real-world use of ODX RS in early breast cancer (BC) pN0/N1 patients and its impact on adjuvant CT decisions.

Methods

LISE is an ongoing observational study comprehensively evaluating BC characteristics, management practices and outcomes in 3,122 patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2021 at Courlancy Cancer Institute (Reims, France).

Results

Among 1,160 eligible HR+/HER2- patients from an interim analysis (N=1,626), ODX testing was performed in 231 patients (19.9%). Pathological tumor size distribution was as follows: pT1a 0.9%, pT1b 12.8%, pT1c 58.0%, pT2 27.9%, pT3-4 0.5%. 78.4% of cases were pN0, 8.6% were pN1mic and 13.0% pN1. Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading was as follows: SBR I 16.0%, SBR II 68.5%, SBR III 15.5%. Luminal A and Luminal B HER2- subtypes accounted for 31.1% and 68.8% of cases, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed highest ODX use in pT1c or pT2 tumors, with Ki-67 ≥20% and SBR I-II grading. RS distribution and its impact on adjuvant CT decisions are reported in the table. Table: 11P

ODX testing impact on adjuvant CT decisions
ODX RS Distribution a Before RS After RS % change b
No CT benefit Minimal CT benefit Potential CT benefit Substantial CT benefit HT HT±CT c HT+CT HT HT+CT
ODX performed n=231 66.7% 6.1% 10.8% 16.5% 29.7% 60.7% 9.6% 79.0% 21.0% -70.0%
pN0 n=181 78.4% 71.3% 7.9% 3.4% 17.4% 27.8% 65.7% 6.5% 77.5% 22.5% -69.4%
pN1mic – N1 n=50 21.6% No CT benefit Potential CT benefit Substantial CT benefit 34.7% 44.9% 20.4% 84.0% 16.0% -75.4%
50.0% 38.0% 12.0%

CT: chemotherapy, HT: hormonotherapy, ODX: Oncotype DX, RS: recurrence score.

aCut-offs were based on criteria from TAILORx and RxPONDER studies.

bReduction in CT indication.

cUndecided due to discordant or intermediate histoprognostic factors.

Conclusions

ODX testing demonstrated major changes in therapeutic choices. In pN0 and pN1mic-N1 patients, CT indication was decreased by 69.4% and 75.4%, respectively. Our real-world clinical practice results describe the ‘grey area’ population requiring ODX prescription and confirm the utility of ODX to guide management and avoid overtreatment.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bruno Cutuli, Institut du Cancer Courlancy, Reims, France.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.