Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

8P - An immunological signature to predict outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Date

04 May 2022

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Immunotherapy;  Translational Research

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Celine Blaye

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_3): S123-S147. 10.1016/annonc/annonc888

Authors

C. Blaye1, E. Darbo2, M. Debled3, V. Brouste4, V. Vélasco4, C. Pinard5, I. Pellegrin2, A. Tarricone2, M. Arnedos1, J. Commeny4, H. Bonnefoi3, C. Larmonier4, G. Macgrogan4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Institute Bergonié, Bordeaux/FR
  • 2 Université de Bordeaux - Campus de Carreire / Victoire, Bordeaux, CEDEX/FR
  • 3 Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), 33076 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 4 Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), Bordeaux/FR
  • 5 CHU - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Cedex/MQ

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 8P

Background

When triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), they have a high risk of metastatic relapse. With immune infiltrate in TNBC being prognostic and predictive of response to treatment, our aim was to develop an immunologic transcriptomic signature using post NACT samples to predict relapse more accurately.

Methods

We identified 115 samples of residual tumors from post-NACT TNBC patients. We profiled the expression of 770 genes related to cancer microenvironment using the NanoString PanCancer IO360 panel to develop a prognostic transcriptomic signature, and to describe the immune microenvironments of the residual tumors.

Results

Thirty-eight (33%) patients experienced metastatic relapse. Hierarchical clustering separated patients into 5 clusters with distinct prognosis based on pathways linked to immune activation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell cycle. Clusters enriched in immune activation had a significantly better prognosis. We selected eight immune-related genes (BLK, GZMM, CXCR6, LILRA1, SPIB, CCL4, CXCR4, SLAMF7) to develop a prognostic transcriptomic signature. We also developed an extended signature comprising 55 genes with a high correlation score (≥ 0.8) with at least one gene from the 8-gene signature. A high 8-gene signature score or extended signature score was associated with a significantly better distant-relapse free interval in our cohort (HR 0.18 [95%CI 0.09-0.35], P < 0.001 and HR 0.27 [95%CI 0.14-0.51], P < 0.001, respectively). Both signatures were tested on TNBC patients from METABRIC cohort (n = 251) and were associated with a better disease-specific survival (8-gene signature: HR 0.53 [95%CI 0.35-0.8], P < 0.01 and extended signature: HR 0.43 [95%CI 0.2- 0.64], P < 0.001). In our cohort, the 8-gene signature as well as the RCB score were validated as independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Lack of immune activation after NACT is associated with a high risk of distant relapse. We propose a prognostic signature based on immune infiltrate that could help select patients in need of adjuvant therapies.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Gaëtan MacGrogan.

Funding

Comité Prévention Dépistage des Cancers.

Disclosure

M. Arnedos: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Puma, AstraZeneca, AbbVie; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Masterclass: Roche, Genomic Health; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Preceptorship: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Puma. H. Bonnefoi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.