Abstract 365P
Background
Access to biopsy services is a limiting factor to timely lung cancer diagnosis in many areas in the Philippines. On-site pathology evaluation allows for rapid diagnosis and helps ensure adequate specimen sampling. In our institution, its utilization and impact have not yet been evaluated.
Methods
We reviewed biopsy records of patients diagnosed with lung cancer in a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines from September 2017 to August 2019. For each procedure, we determined whether on-site pathology evaluation was performed. Furthermore, its association with the need for re-biopsy, time to cancer diagnosis, receipt of systemic treatment and time to treatment initiation was determined. We used the z test for two proportions to anlayze binary variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.
Results
A total of 112 pathology reports on 88 patients were reviewed. On-site evaluation was performed in 25 (22.3%) procedures (frozen section in 15, adequacy evaluation in 10). A re-biopsy was recommended in 37 procedures (33.0%) due to inadequate yield, of which only 24 (64.9%) were pursued. Patients who did not undergo on-site evaluation had a longer median time to cancer diagnosis (34 vs. 17 days, p = 0.04) and were more likely to require a re-biopsy (41% vs. 12%, p = 0.01). They were also less likely to eventually undergo systemic treatment (22.8% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.02), while a trend for a longer median time to treatment initiation did not reach statistical significance (145 vs. 83 days, p = 0.14). Among procedures where on-site evaluation was performed, there were only three instances when a repeat biopsy was recommended. In one case, the specimen was judged to be inadequate, but this was not followed by sampling of more tissue. In the other two cases, the specimen was deemed adequate but turned out to be insufficient for immunohistochemical evaluation.
Conclusions
On-site pathologic evaluation was associated with an earlier lung cancer diagnosis, a reduced need for a repeat biopsy, and a higher proportion of patients eventually receiving treatment. Efforts should be undertaken to increase the utilization of this service in order to optimize the quality of care for these patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R.E. King: Research grant/Funding (institution), Recipient of Pfizer Global Medical Grant: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
163P - Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) in an Asian institution from 2002 to 2018
Presenter: Evelyn Yi Ting Wong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session