Abstract 172P
Background
Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognosis was still unsatisfactory. Recently, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results for patients with advanced HCC. Considering different anti-malignancy mechanisms, combining these three modalities may improve outcomes. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib, toripalimab, plus HAIC versus lenvatinib alone for advanced HCC patients.
Methods
This was a retrospective study including patients treated with lenvatinib alone (8 mg [≤60kg] or 12mg [>60kg] once daily) or lenvatinib, toripalimab plus HAIC (LeToHAIC group, lenvatinib once daily 0-1 week prior to initial HAIC, 240 mg toripalimab 0-1 day prior to every HAIC cycle, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2400 mg/m2 for 46 hours, every 3 weeks]). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) were compared.
Results
From February 2019 to August 2019, 157 patients were included for this study: 71 in the LeToHAIC group, and 86 in the lenvatinib group. The LeToHAIC group showed a longer PFS (11.1 vs 5.1 months, p<0.001), a longer OS (not reached vs 11 months, p<0.001), a higher DCR (RECIST or mRECIST: 90.1% vs 72.1%, p=0.005), a higher ORR (RECIST: 59.2% vs 9.3%, p<0.001; mRECIST: 67.6% vs 16.3%, p<0.001) than the lenvatinib group. In addition, 14.1% of patients in the LeToHAIC group achieved complete response by mRECIST criteria. Grade 3/4 TRAEs that were more frequent in the LeToHAIC group than in the lenvatinib group included neutropenia (8.5% vs 1.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.6% vs 0), and nausea (5.6% vs 0).
Conclusions
Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and HAIC had acceptable toxic effects and might improve survival compared with lenvatinib alone in advanced HCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session