Abstract 412P
Background
A significant proportion of newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC patients does not receive a first-line platinum doublet due to unfavorable clinical characteristics.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data on 221 EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% patients [median age 79 (range 56-92) years, M/F 165(74.6%)/56(25.4%), PS 0/1/≥2 23(10.4%)/94(42.5%)/103(47.1%), adenoK/squamous/large-cell/NOS 107(48.4%)/94(42.5%)/9(4.1%)/11(5%), median of 2 serious comorbidities] with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with a first-line single agent. Clinicians were asked about the criteria according to which treatment selection was made and what percentage of patients did not receive a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Results
A median of 25% (range 10%-30%) of newly diagnosed NSCLC did not receive a first-line platinum combination. The main clinical criteria according to which decision was made were older age (76.5%), comorbidities (72%), low PS (55.2%) and familiar or social issues (10%). Single-agent treatment consisted of gemcitabine (Gem 10%), oral standard vinorelbine (Vin 8.2%), oral metronomic vinorelbine (MetV 78.6%) and other (O 3.2%). Median time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of single agent treatments were Gem 4.5, Vin 4.5, MetV 5, O 5 months and Gem 9, Vin 9, MetV 10, O 10.5 months respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were lower with MetV (8%) than with Gem (13.6%), Vin (16.6%) and O (14.3%). Median TTP and OS without grade 3-4 toxicity were Gem 5, Vin 4.5, MetV 6.5, O 5.5 months and Gem 10, Vin 10, MetV 12, O 12 months respectively. Dose delays (Gem 41%, Vin 16.6%, MetV 13.8%, O 28.6%) and dose reductions (Gem 31.8%, Vin 33.3%, MetV 17.8%, O 28.6%) were less frequent with MetV.
Conclusions
We confirmed that up to 30% of newly diagnosed advanced EGFR/ALK negative and PD-L1 <50% NSCLC patients do not receive a first-line platinum doublet. Main clinical selection criteria were older age (>70years), comorbidities and low (≥2) PS. An oral treatment was frequently proposed with MetV being the preferred alternative chosen by clinicians due to the excellent safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
34P - Clinical significance of neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for II and III stage breast cancer: A meta-analysis of published studies
Presenter: Meng chen Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
35P - Pathological response to weekly nabpaclitaxel and carboplatin followed by anthracycline regimen in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Goteti Sharat Chandra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
36P - Survival in patients with contralateral breast cancer
Presenter: Sergey Kamishov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
37P - Correlation between haematological toxicity with quality of life in breast cancer patients after first-cycle chemotherapy
Presenter: felix Wijovi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
38P - Evaluation of the prognostic value of innate immunity-related biomarkers in early breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Veronica Martini
Session: e-Poster Display Session
39P - CSF-1R inhibitor (C019199) enhances antitumor effect in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy on murine breast cancer models
Presenter: Jiani Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
40P - Molecular subtypes and imaging phenotypes of breast cancer: MRI
Presenter: Yulduz Khatamovna
Session: e-Poster Display Session
41P - Mir-223 overexpression is associated with increased expression of EGFR and worse prognosis in Indonesian TNBC patients
Presenter: Ibnu Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
42P - Impact of germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis in Kazakh population
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
50P - Efficacy and safety analysis of pyrotinib in lapatinib resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective study
Presenter: Yijia Hua
Session: e-Poster Display Session