Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

359P - The role of adjuvant targeted therapy for postoperative EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Guang Ling Jie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1378-S1381. 10.1016/annonc/annonc365

Authors

G.L. Jie, H.L. Lu, S.Y. Liu, S.Y. Liu, J.T. Zhang, W. Zhong, X. Yang, Y. Wu

Author affiliations

  • Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, 510080 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 359P

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) have shown promising efficacy in clinical trials for resected EGFR mutant NSCLC. However, it is still unclear which type of adjuvant regimens can provide best survival benefit among multiple therapeutic strategies. Herein, we performed a network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatments for resected EGFR mutant NSCLC.

Methods

Studies comparing two or more adjuvant treatments for resected EGFR mutant NSCLC were included. Study outcomes were DFS and OS with hazard ratio and adverse events with odds ratio. The primary endpoint was DFS. Registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42020184514).

Results

10 eligible trials involved 2707 patients and 6 treatments: 3 EGFR-TKIs (osimertinib, erlotinib, gefitinib), TKI following chemotherapy (CT+TKI), chemotherapy alone and placebo. Osimertinib showed the most favorable DFS, with significant superiority versus erlotinib (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.24-0.66), gefitinib (0.42, 0.26-0.67), chemotherapy (0.23, 0.15-0.33) and placebo (0.17, 0.12- 0.24), but with no significant improvement versus CT +TKI (0.86, 0.42-1.74). CT +TKI provided the best OS benefit across assessable treatments (versus placebo, HR, 0.6 [0.11, 3.34]). OS data form osimertinib was not yet mature. Osimertinib had the fewest toxicity, whereas CT +TKI or chemotherapy alone caused most toxic effects. In subgroup analysis, EGFR-TKIs monotherapy provided more survival improvement for patients with exon 19 deletion than with L858R mutation (HR, 0.31 [0.13, 0.75] for exon 19 deletion, and 0.48 [0.35, 0.65] for L858R mutation, respectively).

Conclusions

These results showed that adjuvant EGFR-TKIs with or without chemotherapy can improve survival outcomes compared with placebo or adjuvant chemotherapy for resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Osimertinib provided the most DFS benefits and safety profile among the 6 treatments. Considering both efficacy and toxic effect, osimertinib is a promising agent in adjuvant setting for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, especially for those with exon 19 deletion.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Yi-Long Wu.

Funding

This project supported by the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Translational Medicine (2017B0303141 20 to Y.L. WU), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872510, 81673031 to W.Z. ZHONG).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.