Abstract 123P
Background
To study the relationship between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and clinicopathological factors in gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage and the clinical significance of PNI in predicting the survival of patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage.
Methods
Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 115 gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with anastomotic leakage after radical surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the 4th Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 1 2004 to December 31 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. PNI values were calculated [PNI = absolute lymphocyte count (109/L) x 5 + serum albumin (g/L)], and was grouped according to the PNI mean value. Relationships of PNI with patient gender, age, tumor stage, tumor differentiation, tumor location, lymph node metastasis were analyzed. For survival analysis, log-rank method was used for univariate analysis, and Cox method was used for multivariate analysis.
Results
The mean PNI of patients with anastomotic leakage was 48.51 (43.25∼56.25). The 5-year survival rate of patients with PNI ≤48.51 was 58.9%, and the 5-year survival rate for patients with PNI>48.51 was 59.3%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.127, P=0.722). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that N stage is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients with PNI≤48.51. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is an independent risk factor for the survival of patients with PNI>48.51. P for interaction between PNI and treatment modality: P=0.037.
Conclusions
The independent prognostic factors of patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma combined with anastomotic leakage are N stage and adjuvant treatment for PNI≤48.51 and PNI>48.51 group, respectively. For patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma combined with anastomotic leakage, PNI is an important factor for guiding the selection of appropriate postoperative treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
24P - The Pink Vans: Bringing cancer screening closer to home
Presenter: Frederic Ivan Ting
Session: e-Poster Display Session
25P - Identification of gene mutations in patients with breast cancer in a region located in the southeast of the European part of Russia
Presenter: Alexander Sultanbaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
26P - Body mass index and clinical outcomes in Egyptian women with breast cancer: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Amrou Mamdouh Abdeen Shaaban
Session: e-Poster Display Session
27P - Breast cancer primary site and laterality as predictive factors of prognosis: SEER based analysis for survival
Presenter: Eman Zin Eldin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
28P - Breast cancer care services at Nilai Medical Centre: A Malaysian experience
Presenter: Ratnavelu Kananathan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
29P - Factors affecting breast self-examination (BSE) behaviour among female high school students in Denpasar City, Bali
Presenter: Cindy Trisina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
30P - Male breast cancer: A rural based peripheral cancer center experience
Presenter: SACHIN KHANDELWAL
Session: e-Poster Display Session
31P - The prognostic value of pre-treatment peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and its correlation with mutant p53 expression in Indonesian triple negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rosita Purwanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
32P - Clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors in male breast cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Izzet Dogan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
33P - FDG-PET predictivity of pathological axillary nodal status in carcinoma breast-upfront and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting
Presenter: Krithikaa Sekar
Session: e-Poster Display Session