Abstract 123P
Background
To study the relationship between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and clinicopathological factors in gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage and the clinical significance of PNI in predicting the survival of patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage.
Methods
Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 115 gastroesophageal junction cancer patients with anastomotic leakage after radical surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the 4th Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 1 2004 to December 31 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. PNI values were calculated [PNI = absolute lymphocyte count (109/L) x 5 + serum albumin (g/L)], and was grouped according to the PNI mean value. Relationships of PNI with patient gender, age, tumor stage, tumor differentiation, tumor location, lymph node metastasis were analyzed. For survival analysis, log-rank method was used for univariate analysis, and Cox method was used for multivariate analysis.
Results
The mean PNI of patients with anastomotic leakage was 48.51 (43.25∼56.25). The 5-year survival rate of patients with PNI ≤48.51 was 58.9%, and the 5-year survival rate for patients with PNI>48.51 was 59.3%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.127, P=0.722). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that N stage is an independent risk factor for the prognosis of patients with PNI≤48.51. Postoperative adjuvant treatment is an independent risk factor for the survival of patients with PNI>48.51. P for interaction between PNI and treatment modality: P=0.037.
Conclusions
The independent prognostic factors of patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma combined with anastomotic leakage are N stage and adjuvant treatment for PNI≤48.51 and PNI>48.51 group, respectively. For patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma combined with anastomotic leakage, PNI is an important factor for guiding the selection of appropriate postoperative treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
434P - Pan-Canadian evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care by medical oncologists? Is there a need?
Presenter: Kiran Virik
Session: e-Poster Display Session
435P - Hypnotics and risk of cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies
Presenter: Tzu Rong Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
436P - Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of adolescent and young adult (AYA) melanoma: Results from an Asian perspective
Presenter: Wei Lin Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
437P - Long-term efficacy and toxicity outcome of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for medullary thyroid cancer: A single institution cohort study
Presenter: Ka Man Cheung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
438P - Real-world data of relapse after adjuvant treatment (Tx) in high-risk melanoma
Presenter: Carolina Ortiz Velez
Session: e-Poster Display Session
439P - Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and Ki-67 in glioblastoma (GBM) and their correlations with patient survival
Presenter: Paulo Luz
Session: e-Poster Display Session
440P - Blinded independent central review of oncology trials: The monitoring of readers' performance
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: e-Poster Display Session
441P - Influence of radiation therapy of patients with somatotropic pituitary adenomas depending on the age of patients
Presenter: Saodat Issaeva
Session: e-Poster Display Session
442P - Results from the registrational phase I/II ARROW trial of pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients (pts) with advanced RET mutation-positive medullary thyroid cancer (RET+ MTC)
Presenter: Bhumsuk Keam
Session: e-Poster Display Session