Abstract 73P
Background
Exportin 1(XPO-1) is overexpressed in various tumors and selinexor is a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of XPO-1, leading to intranuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins. In vivo studies have suggested that selinexor in combination with various chemotherapeutics exerts antitumor activity in multiple cancers.
Methods
This was an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a “3 + 3” design and a “basket type” expansion. CP + selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. While carboplatin was dosed at AUC6 along with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 IV Q3W, selinexor was dosed at 60 mg twice weekly (BIW) or 40-60 mg once weekly (QW). Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors whose disease was refractory, had relapsed following prior systemic therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate and acceptable, were eligible.
Results
Six patients with the median age of 51 (range, 37–69 years) were treated, and 4 were evaluable for response. The cancer types were ovarian (n=2), and 1 each with thymoma, cervical, rectal, and non-small cell lung cancers. All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and the common TEAE were thrombocytopenia (6/6), neutropenia (5/6), fatigue (5/6), anemia (4/6), leukopenia (4/6), elevated AST or ALT (3/6), nausea (3/6), and vomiting (3/6). The most prevalent grade ≥3 TEAE were thrombocytopenia (4/6), anemia (3/6), neutropenia (3/6), leukopenia (2/6), and fatigue (2/6). A patient dosed at selinexor 40mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 fatigue despite medical supportive care ≥5 days. The patient with lung adenocarcinoma who had 2 prior therapies including prior carbo-taxol achieved partial response (PR) whereas 2 patients with ovarian cancer and cervical cancer had stable disease (SD), contributing the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD ≥4 months) of 50%.
Conclusions
Albeit the number of patients in this study arm was small, once weekly oral selinexor in combination with CP was plausible and conferred some clinical activity and disease stabilization. The RP2D of selinexor was 40 mg QW in combination with CP.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02419495.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Karyopharm.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
325P - Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study in a single center in the Philippines
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
326P - Management of diffuse large B cell lymphomas in the COVID-19 era
Presenter: David Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
327P - COVID-19 in patients with oncohematologic diseases in Kazakhstan
Presenter: Zaure Dushimova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
328P - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on 30 days colorectal cancer patients mortality undergoing emergency operation
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
329P - Radiotherapy palliative and COVID-19: Experience of radiotherapy oncology department of Cancer Center Tlemcen, Algeria
Presenter: Asma Mous
Session: e-Poster Display Session
330P - COVID and cancer: Choosing between hammer and anvil
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
331P - The clock stopped with COVID-19 but continued ticking for cancer patients
Presenter: Sasi Shanmugam Senga
Session: e-Poster Display Session
336P - Efficacy of methylcobalamin administered intravenously for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): A prospective crossover study
Presenter: Jun Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
337P - A prospective study about the quality of life and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: e-Poster Display Session
338P - Vitamin E in the treatment of chemotherapy and radiation-induced mucositis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Michelle Joane Alcantara
Session: e-Poster Display Session