Abstract 73P
Background
Exportin 1(XPO-1) is overexpressed in various tumors and selinexor is a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of XPO-1, leading to intranuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins. In vivo studies have suggested that selinexor in combination with various chemotherapeutics exerts antitumor activity in multiple cancers.
Methods
This was an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a “3 + 3” design and a “basket type” expansion. CP + selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. While carboplatin was dosed at AUC6 along with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 IV Q3W, selinexor was dosed at 60 mg twice weekly (BIW) or 40-60 mg once weekly (QW). Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors whose disease was refractory, had relapsed following prior systemic therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate and acceptable, were eligible.
Results
Six patients with the median age of 51 (range, 37–69 years) were treated, and 4 were evaluable for response. The cancer types were ovarian (n=2), and 1 each with thymoma, cervical, rectal, and non-small cell lung cancers. All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and the common TEAE were thrombocytopenia (6/6), neutropenia (5/6), fatigue (5/6), anemia (4/6), leukopenia (4/6), elevated AST or ALT (3/6), nausea (3/6), and vomiting (3/6). The most prevalent grade ≥3 TEAE were thrombocytopenia (4/6), anemia (3/6), neutropenia (3/6), leukopenia (2/6), and fatigue (2/6). A patient dosed at selinexor 40mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 fatigue despite medical supportive care ≥5 days. The patient with lung adenocarcinoma who had 2 prior therapies including prior carbo-taxol achieved partial response (PR) whereas 2 patients with ovarian cancer and cervical cancer had stable disease (SD), contributing the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD ≥4 months) of 50%.
Conclusions
Albeit the number of patients in this study arm was small, once weekly oral selinexor in combination with CP was plausible and conferred some clinical activity and disease stabilization. The RP2D of selinexor was 40 mg QW in combination with CP.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02419495.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Karyopharm.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session