Abstract 73P
Background
Exportin 1(XPO-1) is overexpressed in various tumors and selinexor is a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of XPO-1, leading to intranuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins. In vivo studies have suggested that selinexor in combination with various chemotherapeutics exerts antitumor activity in multiple cancers.
Methods
This was an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a “3 + 3” design and a “basket type” expansion. CP + selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. While carboplatin was dosed at AUC6 along with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 IV Q3W, selinexor was dosed at 60 mg twice weekly (BIW) or 40-60 mg once weekly (QW). Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors whose disease was refractory, had relapsed following prior systemic therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate and acceptable, were eligible.
Results
Six patients with the median age of 51 (range, 37–69 years) were treated, and 4 were evaluable for response. The cancer types were ovarian (n=2), and 1 each with thymoma, cervical, rectal, and non-small cell lung cancers. All patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and the common TEAE were thrombocytopenia (6/6), neutropenia (5/6), fatigue (5/6), anemia (4/6), leukopenia (4/6), elevated AST or ALT (3/6), nausea (3/6), and vomiting (3/6). The most prevalent grade ≥3 TEAE were thrombocytopenia (4/6), anemia (3/6), neutropenia (3/6), leukopenia (2/6), and fatigue (2/6). A patient dosed at selinexor 40mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 fatigue despite medical supportive care ≥5 days. The patient with lung adenocarcinoma who had 2 prior therapies including prior carbo-taxol achieved partial response (PR) whereas 2 patients with ovarian cancer and cervical cancer had stable disease (SD), contributing the clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD ≥4 months) of 50%.
Conclusions
Albeit the number of patients in this study arm was small, once weekly oral selinexor in combination with CP was plausible and conferred some clinical activity and disease stabilization. The RP2D of selinexor was 40 mg QW in combination with CP.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02419495.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Karyopharm.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session