Abstract 156P
Background
The splenic hilar lymph node (No. 10 LN) dissection is still controversial for patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) not invading the greater curvature. We aim to evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymphadenectomy (LSPL) for APGC not invading the greater curvature and the characteristic of No. 10 LN metastasis.
Methods
Between January 2015 and December 2018, 536 APGC patients with clinical stage cT2-4a/N0-3/M0 not invading the greater curvature were enrolled and randomized to receive laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with either D2 lymphadenectomy (D2 group) or D2 lymphadenectomy without No. 10 LN dissection (D2- group). The morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery, and number of retrieved LNs between the two groups were compared. Risk factors and the metastasis rate of No.10 LN were analyzed.
Results
The present analysis included 263 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity between the D2 and D2- groups (all P>0.05), and no mortality in both groups. There were more retrieved LNs in the D2 group than in the D2- group (45.1 vs 40.6, P=0.001). The metastasis rate of the No. 10 LN was 13.3% (35/263): 4.9% (2/41) in the early stage, and 14.9% (18/223) in the advanced stage. Pathological T (pT) stage and pN stage were related to No. 10 LN metastasis. The metastasis rates of No. 10 LN in T3-4a tumors located in the lesser curvature, posterior wall or multiple parts were all higher than 10%.
Conclusions
Experienced surgeons can safely perform LSPL for APGC with more retrieved LNs. For APGC located in the lesser curvature, posterior wall, or multiple parts with a clinical stage cT3-4a, the dissection of No.10 LN is recommended, but long-term follow-up is still required.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02333721.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session