Abstract 107P
Background
The PRECONNECT study assessed safety and efficacy of FTD/TPI in previously treated mCRC patients in daily practice. This analysis presents the results from the Australian patient cohort.
Methods
Enrolled patients had confirmed mCRC and ECOG PS of 0 or 1, previously treated with, or not considered candidates for available therapies. Patients received FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2, orally bid, on days 1–5 and 8–12 in a 28-day cycle) with follow-up to the end of study treatment. Withdrawal criteria included disease progression, unacceptable toxicity and commercial availability of FTD/TPI. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints were PFS and QoL.
Results
70 Australian patients from 9 centres received at least one dose at cut-off (May 2018). At baseline, median age was 61 years (range 27–77); 57.1% male; 80% Caucasian, 14.3% Asian, 1.4% Black. ECOG PS was 0/1 in 54%/44%. 60% had RAS-mutant cancers; 10% had BRAF-(V600E) mutant cancers. Primaries were left-sided in 71%, right-sided in 14% (14% not specified). Over 98% received prior fluoropyrimidine and/or oxaliplatin, irinotecan, while 91%, 36% and 0% received anti-VEGF, anti-EGFR or regorafenib respectively. Most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAs) were nausea (49%), asthenia/fatigue (40%), neutropenia (34%), vomiting (33%), diarrhoea (26%), Anemia (21%) and constipation (20%). Most common TEAs grade ≥3 were: neutropenia (31%), anaemia (10%), diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain (3%). TEAs led to patient withdrawal in 7% and dosage reduction in 9%. Median treatment duration was 3 cycles (range 1–16). Median relative dose intensity was 92%. FTD/TPI was associated with a median PFS of 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4–3.4) and disease control rate of 40% (95% CI, 28.47–52.41). Median time to ECOG PS decline to ³2 was 14 months. Mean QLQC30 GHS at baseline was 67.2 (±17.8) with mean change from baseline to end of therapy of -11.3 (±21.7) points.
Conclusions
Results from the Australian cohort are consistent with the global PRECONNECT population and randomised datasets in previously treated mCRC patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03306394.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier.
Funding
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier.
Disclosure
G. Tancock: Full/Part-time employment: Servier Australia Pty. Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session