Abstract 422P
Background
Metastatic osteosarcoma at presentation forms 10 to 20% of total osteosarcomas diagnosed. They have a very poor prognosis compared to non-metastatic subset. Patients with resectable metastasis have a better DFS and OS compared to unresectable metastatic disease at presentation. This study was done to find the response rate to first line cisplatin and adriamycin combination chemotherapy to upfront metastatic osteosarcoma patients and time to progression after first line chemotherapy. Secondary objective was to find the overall survival.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma at madras medical college were identified from the database for a period of 5.5 years from January 2013 to June 2018. From that patients who had metastasis at presentation were further sorted out and taken for analysis.
Results
77 patients were diagnosed to have osteosarcoma during the 5.5year period. Among them 36 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. 28 patients were male (77.8%) and 8 patients were female (22.2%). Median age of the patients was 19.5 years. 23 patients had ECOG PS 2 (63.9%) and 12 had ECOG PS 1 (33.3%) and 1 had ECOG PS 3 (2.8%). Tibia and femur were the most common primary site (75%). 5 patients had resectable lung metastasis and underwent pulmonary metastasectomy and were excluded from analysis and 1 patient was on palliative care only. Among remaining 30 patients, 27 patients had multiple lung metastasis (90%) and 3 patients had bone metastasis (10%). 30 patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy with adriamycin 25mg/m2 on d1-d3 and cisplatin 100mg/m2 on d1 repeated every 21 days except 3 who progressed during chemotherapy. 17 patients (56.7%) had grade 1-2 vomiting. No one developed any acute cardiotoxicity. No treatment related death occurred. At the end of 6 cycles, 22 patients (73.3%) had partial response and 5 patients (16.7%) had stable disease and 3 patients (10%) had progressive disease. Median time to progression was 11.5 months. 2year OS was 73.3%.
Conclusions
This platinum doublet is a reasonable option for these patients as most of them are young.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session
325P - Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study in a single center in the Philippines
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
326P - Management of diffuse large B cell lymphomas in the COVID-19 era
Presenter: David Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
327P - COVID-19 in patients with oncohematologic diseases in Kazakhstan
Presenter: Zaure Dushimova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
328P - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on 30 days colorectal cancer patients mortality undergoing emergency operation
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
329P - Radiotherapy palliative and COVID-19: Experience of radiotherapy oncology department of Cancer Center Tlemcen, Algeria
Presenter: Asma Mous
Session: e-Poster Display Session
330P - COVID and cancer: Choosing between hammer and anvil
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
331P - The clock stopped with COVID-19 but continued ticking for cancer patients
Presenter: Sasi Shanmugam Senga
Session: e-Poster Display Session
336P - Efficacy of methylcobalamin administered intravenously for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): A prospective crossover study
Presenter: Jun Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
337P - A prospective study about the quality of life and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: e-Poster Display Session