Abstract 422P
Background
Metastatic osteosarcoma at presentation forms 10 to 20% of total osteosarcomas diagnosed. They have a very poor prognosis compared to non-metastatic subset. Patients with resectable metastasis have a better DFS and OS compared to unresectable metastatic disease at presentation. This study was done to find the response rate to first line cisplatin and adriamycin combination chemotherapy to upfront metastatic osteosarcoma patients and time to progression after first line chemotherapy. Secondary objective was to find the overall survival.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma at madras medical college were identified from the database for a period of 5.5 years from January 2013 to June 2018. From that patients who had metastasis at presentation were further sorted out and taken for analysis.
Results
77 patients were diagnosed to have osteosarcoma during the 5.5year period. Among them 36 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. 28 patients were male (77.8%) and 8 patients were female (22.2%). Median age of the patients was 19.5 years. 23 patients had ECOG PS 2 (63.9%) and 12 had ECOG PS 1 (33.3%) and 1 had ECOG PS 3 (2.8%). Tibia and femur were the most common primary site (75%). 5 patients had resectable lung metastasis and underwent pulmonary metastasectomy and were excluded from analysis and 1 patient was on palliative care only. Among remaining 30 patients, 27 patients had multiple lung metastasis (90%) and 3 patients had bone metastasis (10%). 30 patients received 6 cycles of chemotherapy with adriamycin 25mg/m2 on d1-d3 and cisplatin 100mg/m2 on d1 repeated every 21 days except 3 who progressed during chemotherapy. 17 patients (56.7%) had grade 1-2 vomiting. No one developed any acute cardiotoxicity. No treatment related death occurred. At the end of 6 cycles, 22 patients (73.3%) had partial response and 5 patients (16.7%) had stable disease and 3 patients (10%) had progressive disease. Median time to progression was 11.5 months. 2year OS was 73.3%.
Conclusions
This platinum doublet is a reasonable option for these patients as most of them are young.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
312P - Identification of neoantigen-specific T cell response and anti-tumour immunity in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Du
Session: e-Poster Display Session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session