Abstract 289P
Background
Palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiotherapy may be offered for patients who responded to chemotherapy for local control. However, the dose and fractionation schedules used varies between oncologists.
Methods
An online survey via email was conducted for all practicing oncologists in public hospitals in Malaysia. The questionnaires were sent to 42 oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on their practice in giving radiotherapy to patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who responded to palliative chemotherapy,.
Results
33 oncologists responded to the questionnaire, which gave a response rate of 78.5%. Most oncologists (85%) will give radiotherapy if patients responded to palliative chemotherapy, and 90.9% will give radiotherapy alone without concurrent chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules vary among the oncologists, with 55Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks the commonest fractionation used (30.3%), followed by 40Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (24.2%), and 9.1% choosing schedules such 30Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks, 45Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, and 70Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks. The other fractionations used are 52Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks, 50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 60Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 66Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks, and 60Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks. Most oncologists will prefer a fractionation schedules of 3-4 weeks duration (75.8%), with high enough dose to give a good local control and avoiding long treatment duration, as the radiotherapy is non-curative in nature.
Conclusions
There are currently no guidelines or consensus on the optimum radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules for this group of patients. The decision for the preferred dose-fractionation schedules have to take into consideration factors such as symptoms, disease extent and comorbidity. An optimum dose-fractionation schedule which does not prolong the treatment duration and giving the best local control is very much needed, especially in situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session