Abstract 289P
Background
Palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiotherapy may be offered for patients who responded to chemotherapy for local control. However, the dose and fractionation schedules used varies between oncologists.
Methods
An online survey via email was conducted for all practicing oncologists in public hospitals in Malaysia. The questionnaires were sent to 42 oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on their practice in giving radiotherapy to patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who responded to palliative chemotherapy,.
Results
33 oncologists responded to the questionnaire, which gave a response rate of 78.5%. Most oncologists (85%) will give radiotherapy if patients responded to palliative chemotherapy, and 90.9% will give radiotherapy alone without concurrent chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules vary among the oncologists, with 55Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks the commonest fractionation used (30.3%), followed by 40Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (24.2%), and 9.1% choosing schedules such 30Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks, 45Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, and 70Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks. The other fractionations used are 52Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks, 50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 60Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 66Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks, and 60Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks. Most oncologists will prefer a fractionation schedules of 3-4 weeks duration (75.8%), with high enough dose to give a good local control and avoiding long treatment duration, as the radiotherapy is non-curative in nature.
Conclusions
There are currently no guidelines or consensus on the optimum radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules for this group of patients. The decision for the preferred dose-fractionation schedules have to take into consideration factors such as symptoms, disease extent and comorbidity. An optimum dose-fractionation schedule which does not prolong the treatment duration and giving the best local control is very much needed, especially in situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
243P - Target sequencing of 508 genes in Chinese epithelial ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Li Lei
Session: e-Poster Display Session
244P - Optimization of early diagnostics of cervical intraepitelial neoplasies and cervical cancer
Presenter: Zakhirova Nargiza
Session: e-Poster Display Session
245P - Clinicopathological features including response to platinum-based chemotherapy in endometrial carcinomas involving SWI/SNF complex inactivation.
Presenter: Izumi Tanimoto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
246P - Impact of genetically predicted elevated concentrations of C-reactive protein on ovarian cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Haoxin Peng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
247P - The role of p53 gene suppressor and bcl-2 oncoprotein in non-epithelial ovarian tumor prognosis determination among child and adolescent patients
Presenter: Anvar Shukullaev
Session: e-Poster Display Session
248P - The effect of progesterone on ALA-based PDT efficacy in uterine sarcoma cells
Presenter: Ellie Chu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
249P - A Retrospective Study on the Treatment Response of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients to Combination Chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Siti Nabihah Sahralidin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
250P - Health-related Quality of Life in Women with Cervical Cancer
Presenter: Almagul Zhabagina
Session: e-Poster Display Session
251P - Tendency of morbidity and mortality in cervical cancer in the last 10 years in the Republic of Uzbekistan
Presenter: Mirzagaleb Tillyashaykhov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
252P - Secondary data analysis of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in South Korea
Presenter: Soo Young Jeong
Session: e-Poster Display Session