Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

e-Poster Display Session

289P - Radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Date

22 Nov 2020

Session

e-Poster Display Session

Topics

Radiation Oncology

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Chih Kiang Tan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_6): S1347-S1354. 10.1016/annonc/annonc360

Authors

C.K. Tan1, Y.F. Wong2, J.Y. Khoo3, V. Pei Jye4, F.N. Lau2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiotherapy & Oncology, Tung Shin Hospital, 55100 - Kuala Lumpur/MY
  • 2 Radiotherapy And Oncology, National Cancer Institute, 62000 - Putrajaya/MY
  • 3 Radiotherapy & Oncology, Beacon Hospital, 46050 - Petaling Jaya/MY
  • 4 Radiotherapy And Oncology, Sarawak General Hospital, 93586 - Kuching/MY

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 289P

Background

Palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiotherapy may be offered for patients who responded to chemotherapy for local control. However, the dose and fractionation schedules used varies between oncologists.

Methods

An online survey via email was conducted for all practicing oncologists in public hospitals in Malaysia. The questionnaires were sent to 42 oncologists. The questionnaires gathered data on their practice in giving radiotherapy to patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who responded to palliative chemotherapy,.

Results

33 oncologists responded to the questionnaire, which gave a response rate of 78.5%. Most oncologists (85%) will give radiotherapy if patients responded to palliative chemotherapy, and 90.9% will give radiotherapy alone without concurrent chemotherapy. The radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules vary among the oncologists, with 55Gy/20 fractions/4 weeks the commonest fractionation used (30.3%), followed by 40Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks (24.2%), and 9.1% choosing schedules such 30Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks, 45Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, and 70Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks. The other fractionations used are 52Gy/13 fractions/2.5 weeks, 50Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 60Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, 66Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks, and 60Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks. Most oncologists will prefer a fractionation schedules of 3-4 weeks duration (75.8%), with high enough dose to give a good local control and avoiding long treatment duration, as the radiotherapy is non-curative in nature.

Conclusions

There are currently no guidelines or consensus on the optimum radiotherapy dose fractionation schedules for this group of patients. The decision for the preferred dose-fractionation schedules have to take into consideration factors such as symptoms, disease extent and comorbidity. An optimum dose-fractionation schedule which does not prolong the treatment duration and giving the best local control is very much needed, especially in situations such as the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.