Abstract 124P
Background
Carcinoma esophagus is a disease with dismal prognosis and even though treatment has evolved considerably, morbidity after surgery has remained a drawback. We intend to prospectively study the pattern of care for such patients at our centre, how it affects their subsequent quality of life (QoL) and the factors that influence these changes.
Methods
All patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus from May,2017 to May,2019 were included in the study after obtaining informed consent. Patient characteristics, pre-op therapy, surgical details and final histopathology reports were collected. QoL was collected at pre-op, 1 and 6 months after surgery using FACT-E, OES 18 and OG 25 questionnaires. QoL analysis was done comparing the changes that occured after curative surgery with the baseline value.
Results
99 patients underwent curative esophagectomy during the study period. With a mean age of 58.8 and a male to female ratio of 3.54 : 1, 84/99 underwent surgery after NACT. Lower third and GE junction primary adenocarcinomas accounted for 72 % of cases. Totally minimally invasive McKeowns procedure was the most common surgery done (33%). 8 patients comprised the 30-day mortality with 5 patients having anastomotic leak. QoL analysis showed a dip in post-op QoL at 1 month, with improvement to baseline at 6 months, both in general functional scales, as well as symptom scales. The improvement in symptom scales assessed by OES 18 and OG 25 were found to be statistically significant ( p value < 0.05). Younger patients (<50 yrs) and females fared better during the post-op period. There was a trend to better QoL for patients who underwent minimally invasive procedures. Those patients who had post-op complications, had inferior QoL at 1 month, but later improved by 6 months.
Conclusions
Radical esophagectomy can be performed with achievable morbidity and mortality at high volume centres. Global HRQoL scores show a dip during immediate post-surgery period, but then picks up to even eclipse pre-op values. Post-op morbidity, as expected, adversely affects HRQoL, but once patients tide over the immediate period, they often do well as time passes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session