Abstract 293P
Background
OXN PR, a fixed dose combination of opioid and peripherally-acting mu-opioid antagonist, offers analgesia while reducing opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Few have studied OXN vs other strong opioids for impact on bowel function, safety and QoL in patients with CP.
Methods
Systematic review of literature from PubMed and EMBASE that evaluated analgesia, bowel function, adverse events (AE) and QoL after OXN PR or oral oxycodone (OXY)/morphine/tapentadol PR, or transdermal fentanyl, in adults with moderate-severe CP. Data for outcomes were extracted from publications or clinical study reports.
Results
4 RCTs (OXN vs OXY) were found; no RCT compared OXN vs other strong opioids. Analgesia and safety were comparable with OXN or OXY, except for nausea that was less frequent with OXN (Odds ratio: 0.51 [0.26, 0.97]). Most AEs related to OXN and OXY were mild-moderate severity; most common were gastrointestinal disorders. Improved bowel function (BFI, PAC-SYM) was observed with OXN vs OXY (Table). QoL was comparable with OXN or OXY (Global health status, mean difference: 0.5 [-4.7, 5.7]). Table: 293P
Descriptive findings for bowel function
RCTs | Findings | OXN vs OXY | |
BFI | |||
Scores over 4 weeks | 2 | Δ mean (% improvement)† | RCT 1: -25.1 (39.2%) vs -13.6 (21.7%) RCT 2: -36.0 (50.7%) vs -25.0 (36.8%) |
Score comparison at week 4 | 1 | LS mean difference (SE) | -11.1 (4.00) |
95% CI‡ | [-19.0, -3.2] | ||
P value‡ | 0.006 | ||
PAC-SYM | |||
Total score | 1 | Δ mean (% improvement)† | -7.0 (40.3%) vs -2.7 (15.1%) |
P-value§ | 0.0014 | ||
Symptom frequency | 1 | Δ mean (% improvement)† | -1.1 (41.9%) vs -0.3 (12.9%) |
P value§ | <0.001 |
†baseline to week 4 ‡adjusted for baseline using ANCOVA model. §between-group difference; derived from summary statistics LS, least squared.
Conclusions
Systematic review found only direct comparisons of OXN vs OXY in RCTs of CP. OXN provided similar analgesia and safety to OXY for CP with less nausea and improved bowel function, in terms of constipation symptoms. OXN is a valuable analgesic option in patients with OIC or nausea from cancer itself or anticancer treatment. Although limited, this meta-analysis confirms existing evidence on OXN’s efficacy and tolerability in patients with moderate-severe CP and highlights that few data on OXN in CP is available.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by Wei Yi Kwok and Geraldine Toh from Tech Observer Asia Pacific Pte Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd.
Funding
Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd.
Disclosure
S.H. Ahmedzai: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Mundipharma. L. Langenhoven: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Mundipharma. C. Minnaert, Y. Hadjiat: Full/Part-time employment: Mundipharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session