Abstract 140P
Background
Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are related to the prognosis for cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the predictive value of combining the two in gastric cancer (GC) patients.
Methods
Patients in a clinical trial (NCT02327481) from January 2015 to April 2016 were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were generated. By calculating the areas under the curve (AUC) and the C-index, the discriminative ability of CRP during different periods were compared, including preoperative (pre-CRP), postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (post-CRPs) and postoperative maximum CRP (post-CRPmax).
Results
Ultimately, 401 patients were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 42 months (range 3-51 months). For postoperative recurrence, the AUC and C-index of pre-CRP were 0.692 and 0.678, respectively, higher than those for post-CRPs, all p<0.05. Among post-CRPs, post-CRPmax had the highest AUC (0.591) and C-index (0.585). The optimal cut-off values for pre-CRP and post-CRPmax were 3.1mg/L and 77.1mg/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed both pre-CRP≥3.1mg/L (high-pre-CRP) and post-CRPmax≥77.1mg/L (high-post-CRPmax) were independent factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The model consisting of the pre-CRP, post-CRPmax and TNM had higher predictive ability and clinical utility. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) benefit analysis for stage II/III GC showed patients with pre-CRP<3.1mg/L did not benefit from chemotherapy (RFS:90.0% nonchemotherapy group vs 80.7% chemotherapy group, p=0.557). In the high-pre-CRP group, only patients with high-post-CRPmax but not post-CRPmax<77.1mg/L benefited from chemotherapy (RFS:33.2% nonchemotherapy group vs 49.9% chemotherapy group, p=0.037). Similar findings were observed for overall survival.
Conclusions
Both pre-CRP and post-CRPmax, inexpensively and easily obtained, are independent predictors of recurrence for GC. ACT significantly prolonged the RFS for stage II/III GC with high-pre-CRP and high-post-CRPmax after R0 resection.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
313P - Diagnostic value of micro RNA (miRNA) in renal cell cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
314P - Comprehensive microbial signatures and genomic profiling in tumour samples using next generation sequencing
Presenter: Mei Qi Yee
Session: e-Poster Display Session
315P - High-penetrance breast and/or ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Filipinos
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
316P - Implementation of Vela Analytics to accelerate comprehensive interpretation and reporting of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing in clinical diagnostic laboratories
Presenter: Yingnan Yu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
317P - Genomic profiling and molecular pathology of Chinese glioma patients
Presenter: yuanli Zhao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
320P - Psychometric interplay of the perception of the real-life impact of COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies
Presenter: Kelvin Bao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
321P - Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on adherence to treatment schedule among cancer patients
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
322P - Challenged faced by cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: mithra Krishnamani
Session: e-Poster Display Session
323P - Oncology care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during COVID-19
Presenter: Dilyara Kaidarova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session