Abstract 434P
Background
A number of provincial online treatment guidelines/protocols exist in Canada, which differ in the information contained and the ease of use. Currently there is no national evidence-based, consensus-driven cancer treatment protocol for use at the point of care. The aim of such a resource would be to support Medical Oncologists (MOs) in the delivery of cancer treatment at the clinic interface and potentially improve patient outcomes by reducing treatment variation across Canada.
Methods
The study was conducted in two stages. Available provincial cancer treatment protocols were evaluated with regards to: content for chemotherapy, immunotherapy, ease of use, toxicity, dosing recommendations, reference studies. Canadian MOs were invited to participate in an anonymous survey distributed through the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. The assessment included: current online resources (OR) used, information provided, ease of use, relevance to point of care use, need for a national Canadian resource. MOs were asked to review a comparator Pan-Australian OR.
Results
40/327 responded: 28% BC, 26% ON and the rest from other provinces. 82%, 54% and 23% respectively used the BC and ON and other provincial ORs. 50% used ≥2 websites. 62% found the website of choice easy to use, 33% felt it had updated immune therapy information and 26% felt it was updated regularly. The OR used met the MO need for dose/scheduling in 87.5% cases but only 50% and 37.5% cases for AEs and reference information respectively. Criteria evaluated in the ORs included: dosing, toxicity modification, AEs, monitoring, references and other criteria. 95% of MOs felt that a single portal aimed at point of care for Canadian MOs would be of value. 64% felt that the international comparator was better than the current OR being used.
Conclusions
There is variation in the current Canadian OR used by MOs in Canada with a need for national evidence-based, cancer treatment protocols/information for use at the point of care. To develop such a Pan-Canadian website resource, further analysis and infrastructure is required. Such a resource would potentially reduce treatment variability and augment quality of care delivered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
324P - COVID era: Perception of oncologists from a developing nation
Presenter: Rakesh Roy
Session: e-Poster Display Session
325P - Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study in a single center in the Philippines
Presenter: Frances Victoria Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session
326P - Management of diffuse large B cell lymphomas in the COVID-19 era
Presenter: David Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
327P - COVID-19 in patients with oncohematologic diseases in Kazakhstan
Presenter: Zaure Dushimova
Session: e-Poster Display Session
328P - Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on 30 days colorectal cancer patients mortality undergoing emergency operation
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
329P - Radiotherapy palliative and COVID-19: Experience of radiotherapy oncology department of Cancer Center Tlemcen, Algeria
Presenter: Asma Mous
Session: e-Poster Display Session
330P - COVID and cancer: Choosing between hammer and anvil
Presenter: Ullas Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
331P - The clock stopped with COVID-19 but continued ticking for cancer patients
Presenter: Sasi Shanmugam Senga
Session: e-Poster Display Session
336P - Efficacy of methylcobalamin administered intravenously for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): A prospective crossover study
Presenter: Jun Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
337P - A prospective study about the quality of life and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Wala Ben Kridis
Session: e-Poster Display Session