Abstract 305P
Background
Actionable mutation detection by targeted multiple gene panel sequencing is increasingly becoming a routine test in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Although it helps patients choose their own personalized drugs, most mainly focused on single actionable event and ignored the other driver variation which could affect the efficacy of the targetable drugs and patients’ outcome.
Methods
Fresh frozen tumors, pleural effusion or FFPE tumors with matched peripheral blood were collected from 235 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) before therapy. All of the samples were sequenced using commercial gene panel OseqTM series. The genetic molecular profiles, correlations between genetic variations and patient's prognosis were analyzed.
Results
A total of 1713 somatic variations were detected in our cohort including single-nucleotide variants, insertion/deletions, copy number alterations and structural variations. Over 50% of patients carried either EGFR or TP53 alteration. The tumor variant allele frequency of TP53 was a prognostic indicator for LUAD patient. The co-occurring genomic alterations were associated with patients' outcome, especially for genes co-mutated with EGFR, ERBB2 and KDR in the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance pathway. In addition, MYC amplification alone was insufficient as an independent prognostic predictor for LUAD. Moreover, the DNA damage repair genes including ATM, BRCA1and BRCA2 were more likely to alter in patients with wild-type TP53 (TP53wt). The alterations on STK11 and KRAS were enriched in TP53wt and DDRmut individuals and slightly corelated with prognosis of LUAD patients.
Conclusions
We presented an integrated analysis of genetic and clinical outcome features in LUAD cohort. Several novel pairs of concurrent gene variation were found which associated with patients' survival and could be prognostic predictors for treatment evaluation. Our work also shed further light on the genomic subtyping based on DDR genes as promising prognostic biomarkers in LUAD and provide a larger picture of multiple gene sequencing for helping to find optimal treatment in precision anticancer therapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session