Abstract 100P
Background
To explore the clinical feasibility of the patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDTX or PDX) mouse model in guiding the individualized precise treatment of advanced digestive system tumors through a multicenter clinical study.
Methods
14 centers participated the trial in China. Fresh tumor tissues were obtained by surgery and biopsy, then engrafted subcutaneously into immune deficient mice. When the tumor volume grew to 60 mm3, the modeling was successful. The consistency of the original tissue (PA) and the engrafted tissue (P0) was analyzed by pathological comparison. The tumorigenesis time model was recorded. After successful modeling, medication was administered in groups according to the recommended regimen for 21 days. The tumor growth inhibition rate (TGI) was recorded and evaluated as positive if TGI > 60%. According to RECIST 1.1, DCR (SD, PR, CR) was evaluated as positive in clinical synchronous treatment. The two results were compared to evaluate the accuracy of guiding clinical medication.
Results
A total of 33 patients with different advanced digestive system tumors were included, including 2 cases of esophageal cancer, 10 cases of colorectal cancer, 10 cases of pancreatic cancer, 5 cases of gastric cancer, 3 cases of liver cancer, 2 cases of duodenal adenocarcinoma and 1 case of gallbladder cancer. The successful rate of tumor xenograft modeling was 75.8% (25/33), including 78.3% (18/23) in small samples and 70% (7/10) in surgical samples. Pathological results showed that the consistency of P0 and PA was 100% in 25 cases. The average tumorigenesis time of PDTX model was 42 days. Pharmacodynamic tests were completed in 17 cases, including 28 kinds of drugs and 49 regimens. The clinical efficacy of 10 regimens in 9 patients were evaluated as PR in 2 cases, SD in 6 cases and PD in 2 cases. The results of pharmacodynamic test were consistent with clinical synchronous efficacy.
Conclusions
PDTX mouse model has high successful modeling rate with the biological and pathological characteristics of primary tumor, and the results of pharmacodynamic test are highly consistent with the clinical efficacy. It can be used as a individualized diagnosis and treatment technique of advanced gastrointestinal tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Nanjing Personal Oncology Biotechnology Co. Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
94P - Prognostic influence of mean platelet volume on stage III rectal cancer patients: A tertiary cancer center study
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
95P - Prognosis of Japanese patients with detailed RAS/BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
Presenter: Tatsuki Ikoma
Session: e-Poster Display Session
96P - Early-onset colorectal cancer prognosis, conflict resolution, review of literature and meta-analysis
Presenter: Ereny Poles
Session: e-Poster Display Session
97P - A population-based study to assess the associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status (SES) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
98P - Operational challenges of an Asian Pacific (APAC) academic oncology clinical trial
Presenter: Daphne Day
Session: e-Poster Display Session
99P - Development of a qRT-PCR-based diagnostic test to identify colorectal cancer patients with recurrent R-Spondin gene fusions
Presenter: Veronica Diermayr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
101P - HIF1-α depletion overcomes resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer via ERK signalling pathway
Presenter: Se Jun Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
102P - Colorectal cancer organoids culture exploits new neoadjuvant therapy resistance mechanisms and therapeutic targets
Presenter: Yun Deng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
103P - Comprehensive genomic landscape in younger and older Chinese patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Huina Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session