Abstract 339P
Background
Oral mucositis related pain during CTRT in head and neck cancers is a common problem. Unfortunately, in spite of it being common, there is limited evidence for selection of systemic analgesic in this situation. Hence, this study was designed to compare the analgesic effect of an NSAID (diclofenac) versus a weak opioid (tramadol).
Methods
This was an open-label, parallel design, superiority randomized controlled study. In this study head and neck cancer patients undergoing radical or adjuvant chemoradiation, who had grade 1 or above mucositis (in accordance with CTCAE version 4.03) and had pain related to it were randomly assigned to either diclofenac or tramadol for mucositis related pain control. The primary endpoint was analgesia after the 1st dose. The secondary endpoints were the rate of change in analgesic within 1-week, adverse events, and quality of life.
Results
128 patients were randomized, 66 in diclofenac and 62 in tramadol arm. The median AUC for the diclofenac arm and the tramadol arm were 348.936 units (Range 113.64-1969.23) & 420.87 (101.97-1465.96) respectively (p=0.05619). Five patients (8.1%) in the tramadol arm and 11 patients (16.7%) in the diclofenac arm required a change in analgesic within 1 week of starting the analgesic (p=0.184). There was no statistically significant difference in any adverse events between the 2 arms. However, the rate of any grade of renal dysfunction was numerically higher in diclofenac arm (10.6% versus 4.8%, p=0.326).
Conclusions
In this phase III study, evaluating diclofenac and tramadol for CRIM pain, the analgesic efficacy of both analgesics was found to similar, but diclofenac was associated with a higher rate of renal dysfunction.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2016/09/007302.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tata Memorial Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Real world outcomes in elderly women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Nicole Evans
Session: e-Poster Display Session
52P - Chemotherapy selection in routine clinical practice in Japan for HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (KBCRN A001: E-SPEC Study)
Presenter: Yookija Kang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
53P - Aromatase inhibitor and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treated HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer differ to those treated with Aromatase inhibitors alone on progression
Presenter: Indunil Weerasena
Session: e-Poster Display Session
54P - Platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer (ABC): Real-world outcome from a tertiary cancer centre in India
Presenter: Indhuja Vijesh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
55P - Eribulin in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: A real-world data from India
Presenter: Tanmoy Mandal
Session: e-Poster Display Session
56P - Treatment of palbociclib in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in China: A real-world study
Presenter: Yiqi Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
57P - Therapeutic vulnerability of malignant phyllodes tumour to pazopanib identified through a novel patient-derived xenograft and cell line model
Presenter: Dave Ng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
58P - Survival benefit of local treatments in breast cancer with lung metastasis: Results from a large retrospective study
Presenter: Yimeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
59P - The impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in indigenous and non-indigenous patients of Western Australia with breast cancer
Presenter: Azim Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
60P - Risk factors of bone metastasis and skeletal-related events in high-risk breast cancer patients
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: e-Poster Display Session