Abstract 339P
Background
Oral mucositis related pain during CTRT in head and neck cancers is a common problem. Unfortunately, in spite of it being common, there is limited evidence for selection of systemic analgesic in this situation. Hence, this study was designed to compare the analgesic effect of an NSAID (diclofenac) versus a weak opioid (tramadol).
Methods
This was an open-label, parallel design, superiority randomized controlled study. In this study head and neck cancer patients undergoing radical or adjuvant chemoradiation, who had grade 1 or above mucositis (in accordance with CTCAE version 4.03) and had pain related to it were randomly assigned to either diclofenac or tramadol for mucositis related pain control. The primary endpoint was analgesia after the 1st dose. The secondary endpoints were the rate of change in analgesic within 1-week, adverse events, and quality of life.
Results
128 patients were randomized, 66 in diclofenac and 62 in tramadol arm. The median AUC for the diclofenac arm and the tramadol arm were 348.936 units (Range 113.64-1969.23) & 420.87 (101.97-1465.96) respectively (p=0.05619). Five patients (8.1%) in the tramadol arm and 11 patients (16.7%) in the diclofenac arm required a change in analgesic within 1 week of starting the analgesic (p=0.184). There was no statistically significant difference in any adverse events between the 2 arms. However, the rate of any grade of renal dysfunction was numerically higher in diclofenac arm (10.6% versus 4.8%, p=0.326).
Conclusions
In this phase III study, evaluating diclofenac and tramadol for CRIM pain, the analgesic efficacy of both analgesics was found to similar, but diclofenac was associated with a higher rate of renal dysfunction.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2016/09/007302.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tata Memorial Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
144P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
145P - A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
Presenter: Qing-Zhu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
146P - Red cell distribution width and mean corpuscular volume ratio as a promising new marker for chemotherapy effects in remnant gastric cancer: An analysis of a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai-Xiang Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
147P - Can the clinical stage of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification stratify prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III cancer?
Presenter: Hayato Watanabe
Session: e-Poster Display Session
148P - MCV-the ideal answer to predict the prognosis of remnant gastric cancer: An analysis from a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai Weng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
149P - Molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with resectable gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
150P - Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns associated with unresectable advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in China
Presenter: Xiao Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
151P - Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, economic and survival outcomes associated with unresectable advanced metastatic gastric cancers in Taiwan
Presenter: Chee Jen Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
152P - ARID1A deficiency in EBV-positive gastric cancer is partially regulated by EBV-encoded miRNAs, but not by DNA promotor hypermethylation
Presenter: Koji Kase
Session: e-Poster Display Session