Abstract 367P
Background
EGFR-mut status is pivotal to select NSCLC patient for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). Obtaining adequate tissue for genomic analysis is challenging thus plasma cell-free DNA (Plasma-DNA)-based genotyping of EGFR-mut is a reasonable alternative. Sensitivity varies between 60 to 80%; specificity is consistently above 90%. Emerging evidence shows that pleural effusion (PE) is an alternative rich source of cfDNA for EGFR-mut testing despite negative cytology in PE samples. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a sensitive technique and the objective of our study is to examine the diagnostic utility of EGFR genotyping in PE using ddPCR.
Methods
Patients with histologically proven advanced stage NSCLC and PE are eligible. 10 ml of blood and 10 ml of PE were collected after consent. We used ddPCR to detect the EGFR mutations exon 19 del (e19del), exon 21 L858R mut (e21-L858R), exon 20 T790M (e20-T790M) in plasma and PE samples. We used Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 or the “Scorpion-ARMS” therascreen® EGFR RotorGene Q (RGQ) PCR Kit to detect EGFR-mut in tumour samples.
Results
We enrolled 127 patients between November 2016 and June 2020. M vs F = 67 vs 60. Tumor tissue positive for EGFR-mut in 31 (40%) of 77 EGFR-TKI-naïve patients (e19del in 7; e21-L858R in 24; e20-T790M in 1) In the 50 EGFR-TKI resistant NSCLC, tumor sample for EGFR-mut analysis were not available in 13, wild-type in 5, e19del in 20, e21-L858R-mut in 12 and e20 T790M in 14. Diagnostic utility is summarized in the table. Detection rate of T790M is 15% (19/126) in plasma and 27% (34/127) in PE. We found 11 patients with negative T790M plasma samples but tested positive in PE-DNA, and vice versa, 2 samples. Concordance rate of T790M testing between plasma-DNA and PE-DNA is 0.86. Table: 367P
Plasma-DNA vs tumour | PE-DNA vs tumour | Plasma-DNA vs PE DNA | |
EGFR-mut e20-T790M | |||
Sensitivity | 0.46 | 0.86 | - |
Specificity | 0.93 | 0.85 | - |
Concordance | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.86 |
EGFR-mut e19 del and e21-L858R | |||
Sensitivity | 0.76 | 0.93 | - |
Specificity | 0.96 | 0.95 | - |
Concordance | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.92 |
Conclusions
Testing of cfDNA in PE for EGFR mutation including e20-T790M is feasible and highly sensitive, and the concordance to plasma and tumor mutation status is high.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T.C. Kwong, P.Y. Lo: Full/Part-time employment: Sanomics Limited. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session