Abstract 324P
Background
Cancer being a lethal disease, delay in treatment may be fatal. International organizations have come up with useful guidelines for cancer management. Still the availability of resources, infrastructure, state health policy, COVID incidence and approach of healthcare professionals differ. This study aims to find out the perception and approaches of Indian oncologists - which might prove to be useful in nation specific delivery of cancer care during COVID Pandemic.
Methods
After taking consent, a survey form was circulated online amongst oncologists (haemato/ radiation/ medical/ surgical) across the country and responses collected.
Results
79.2% oncologists represent private sector, 16.8% government sector. 50% oncologists were willing to postpone investigations for stable cancer patients. 42.6% willing to start treatment without knowing the COVID status, while 44.6% were against the idea and 12.9% were indecisive. 73% willing to perform surgery right away for operable nonemergency cases with a negative COVID status and rest 27 % willing to postpone surgery. Concurrent Chemoradiation (57%) was preferred over sequential approach (43%). Majority (53.5%) were comfortable prescribing chemotherapy via telemedicine. Asymptomatic COVID positive patients requiring chemotherapy 64.4% were willing to wait for the virus to resolve and then start therapy and 35.6% were suggesting some form of oral therapy and ongoing isolation. 89.1% preferred oral route if option present. 83.7 % preferred targeted therapy, 8.2% immunotherapy and rest went for other options. 93.1 % preferred day care chemotherapy during COVID and not admission. 61 % thought extended course of dexamethasone given as premedication during chemotherapy did not have a protective role for patients during COVID outbreak. Treatment initiation criteria in descending order - 39.6% stage of the disease, 36.6 % performance status, 22.8% COVID status and for rest it was the cost. 91% oncologists thought nurses were at a higher risk of exposure to COVID infection than the doctors. 54.5% were not taking anti COVID prophylaxis..
Conclusions
Greater homogeneity in practice was noticed amongst oncologists of a developing nation during COVID outbreak. The above information might be useful in policy making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
223P - Overall survival (OS) results of phase III ARAMIS study of darolutamide (DARO) added to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
Presenter: Karim Fizazi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
224P - Associations of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) with treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer: A real-world, population-based study
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
225P - Prostate cancer treatments and outcomes in the elderly: A retrospective analysis of an Australian real-world cohort
Presenter: Michael Fernando
Session: e-Poster Display Session
226P - Use of PSMA PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Jensen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
227P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide (enza)-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohorts (C) 4 and 5 update from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Ulka Vaishampayan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
228P - Symptoms and impacts of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) among Japanese patients designated to receive Ra-223
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
229P - Expanding the role of supervised exercise on fatigue in prostate cancer patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Niwanda Yogiswara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
230P - Molecular profiling and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Ranlu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
231P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated follow-up of cohorts (C) 1-3 from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Jeffrey Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
232P - Real-world data on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: A regional experience
Presenter: Rachel Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session